2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node similarity and modularity for finding communities in networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The node similarity measure is used to compute the level of relationship between nodes. This measure is equally used to ascertain if nodes can be grouped together into the same community [ 1 , 3 , 16 ]. We determine the similarity between nodes via the structural similarity, which computes the intersections between the neighbourhood sets of any two nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The node similarity measure is used to compute the level of relationship between nodes. This measure is equally used to ascertain if nodes can be grouped together into the same community [ 1 , 3 , 16 ]. We determine the similarity between nodes via the structural similarity, which computes the intersections between the neighbourhood sets of any two nodes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, existing community detection algorithms reported in the literature were specifically designed to either detect only disjoint nodes or overlapping nodes. Disjoint nodes, also known as node clusters, are nonoverlapping groups of densely connected subgraphs of a network [ 1 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Overlapping nodes are nodes shared by two or more communities at the same time, thereby creating overlapping communities [ 1 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 6 presents a preliminary performance comparison of these algorithms in terms of detected communities and the corresponding modularity Q. For karate club network, ASOCCA obtains two unique connected component sets: set1 = { (24,25,26,27,15,21,23,33,32,31,16,28,29,34,19,30,9), (11,10,13,12,20,14,22,18,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,17)} set2 = { (24,10,25,26,27,15,21,23,33,32,31,16,28,29,34,19,…”
Section: ) Modularity Metrics Analysis Of Small and Medium Real Netwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communities also indicate functional entities in a network. For example, in protein-protein interaction networks, communities represent groups of proteins with a specific function [6,31]; in social networks, communities are groups of people with similar interests or features [20,13]; in product co-purchasing networks (e.g., Amazon and eBay), communities correspond to the categories of products. Moreover, communities are useful in recommendation systems (e.g., location, music and film recommendation), i.e., Feng et al [9] adopted community detection technique to form collaborative recommendations since members in the same community share similar interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%