Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3437963.3441735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Node Similarity Preserving Graph Convolutional Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-Homophilous methods. Various GNNs have been proposed to achieve higher performance in low-homophily settings [82,44,81,17,15,73,36,35]. Geom-GCN [58] introduces a geometric aggregation scheme, MixHop [1] proposes a graph convolutional layer that mixes powers of the adjacency matrix, GPR-GNN [17] features learnable weights that can be positive and negative in feature propagation, GCNII [15] allows deep graph convolutional networks with relieved oversmoothing, which empirically performs better in non-homophilous settings, and H 2 GCN [82] shows that separation of ego and neighbor embeddings, aggregation in higher-order neighborhoods, and the combination of intermediate representations improves GNN performance in low-homophily.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-Homophilous methods. Various GNNs have been proposed to achieve higher performance in low-homophily settings [82,44,81,17,15,73,36,35]. Geom-GCN [58] introduces a geometric aggregation scheme, MixHop [1] proposes a graph convolutional layer that mixes powers of the adjacency matrix, GPR-GNN [17] features learnable weights that can be positive and negative in feature propagation, GCNII [15] allows deep graph convolutional networks with relieved oversmoothing, which empirically performs better in non-homophilous settings, and H 2 GCN [82] shows that separation of ego and neighbor embeddings, aggregation in higher-order neighborhoods, and the combination of intermediate representations improves GNN performance in low-homophily.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, malicious node detection, a key application of graph machine learning, is known to be non-homophilous in many settings [55,13,25,11]. Further, while new GNNs that work better in these non-homophilous settings have been developed [82,44,81,17,15,73,36,35,9,54], their evaluation is limited to a few graph datasets used by Pei et al [58] (collected by [61,66,48]) that have certain undesirable properties such as small size, narrow range of application areas, and high variance between different train/test splits [82]. Consequently, method scalability has not been thoroughly studied in non-homophilous graph learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we focus on perturbing the structure by adding or deleting edges, and evaluating the robustness of our methods on the node classification task. Specifically, we use metattack [40] to perform non-targeted attack, and follow the same experimental setting as [15], i.e., the ratio of changed edges, from 0 to 25% with a step of 5%. We use GCN, GAT, APPNP and FAGCN as baselines and use the default hyperparameter settings in the authors' implementations.…”
Section: Adversarial Defensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low homophily level in some real-word graphs can largely degrade their performance . Some initial efforts (Pei et al 2020;Bo et al 2021;Jin et al 2021;) have been taken to address the problem of heterophilic graphs. For example, H2GCN ) investigated three key designs for GNNs on heterophilic graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, we obtain more discriminative features. Though promising, there is no existing work exploring label-wise message passing to address the challenge of heterophilic graphs (Bo et al 2021;Jin et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%