2002
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise Reduction in BOLD-Based fMRI Using Component Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
206
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chosen approach of modeling the signal by a mixture of Gaussian and Gamma functions allowed for an adequate representation of the ICA maps, but this is not equivalent to null hypothesis testing and family-wise false positive rate thresholding as used in the GLM. Moreover, the GLM noise estimation includes any unmodeled signal fluctuations such as cardiac artifacts, respiration, or residual movement, while the ICA residuals do not include these sources of structured noise, which are rather extracted into separate components (Thomas et al, 2002). This results in additional variability between the maps generated by GLM and ICA methods.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chosen approach of modeling the signal by a mixture of Gaussian and Gamma functions allowed for an adequate representation of the ICA maps, but this is not equivalent to null hypothesis testing and family-wise false positive rate thresholding as used in the GLM. Moreover, the GLM noise estimation includes any unmodeled signal fluctuations such as cardiac artifacts, respiration, or residual movement, while the ICA residuals do not include these sources of structured noise, which are rather extracted into separate components (Thomas et al, 2002). This results in additional variability between the maps generated by GLM and ICA methods.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can identify regions showing a non-canonical HRF and also yield de-noised time courses of cerebral activity as a result of the separation of artifactual components (Thomas et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the ICA decomposition is to rotate the signal components so as to minimize the mutual information between each pair of components, which is equivalent to maximizing the deviation of each component from the Gaussian distribution expected on the Central Limit Theorem. In the fMRI domain, the application of ICA has usually been focused on extracting large effects due to causes unrelated to observer's task, such as head movements, heartbeat, breathing, instrument drift, drift due to general alertness levels, swallowing, etc (e.g., McKeown et al, 1998;Thomas et al, 2002;Calhoun et al, 2002a,b;2004a,b). This is a relatively straightforward analysis based on the assumption that the analyzed signals are statistically independent in time.…”
Section: Independent Components Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since this technique removes only the average timeseries, it is unable to account for voxel-specific phase differences in the noise due to physiological fluctuations. Additionally, component based techniques, utilizing independent component analysis (ICA) or principal components analysis (PCA), have shown potential in identifying spatial and temporal patterns of structured noise (Thomas et al 2002;McKeown et al 2003;Beckmann and Smith 2004). However, the utility of component based methods has been limited to BOLD studies with sampling times short enough to clearly differentiate cardiac and respiratory elements from evoked responses (Thomas et al 2002), in which case a temporal band pass filter would be adequate for noise removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%