2019
DOI: 10.1364/ol.44.002677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise reduction in resonator-based ultrasound sensors by using a CW laser and phase detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MZI is locked to quadrature, hence the differential output signal is linear to the acoustic modulation. This scheme 4 involves two mechanisms for sensitivity enhancement. First, the optical path difference between the two arms of the MZI is set to approximately zero to enable cancellation of phase noise from the laser.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MZI is locked to quadrature, hence the differential output signal is linear to the acoustic modulation. This scheme 4 involves two mechanisms for sensitivity enhancement. First, the optical path difference between the two arms of the MZI is set to approximately zero to enable cancellation of phase noise from the laser.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For optical detection of ultrasound, sensors based on sensing acoustic perturbation of optical resonator mode are the most widely adopted solution for optical ultrasound detection (47,48), including the Fabry-Pérot interferometer for forward detection (28)(29)(30), a microring resonator for out-of-plane detection (31)(32)(33), and π-FBG for lateral detection (see table S4) (34)(35)(36). Since the π-FBG sensor is suitable for detecting laterally incident ultrasound, while fully compatible with the fiber-optic transcerving configuration of intravascular imaging, it is ideal for implementing AO-IVUS catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved through substantial improvement of frequency response bandwidth in both the excitation and detection of ultrasound using optical techniques. The past decade has seen great advances in both optical excitation of ultrasound (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) and optical detection of ultrasound (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36), demonstrating a wide variety of technical solutions. Nevertheless, previous efforts on AO-IVUS have not fully exploited the potential of optical ultrasound excitation and detection, yielding limited ultrasound frequency response bandwidth and resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be minimized through good design. Noise negatively affects the precision of measurements and, for any single measurement, may introduce errors inaccuracy as well [10,11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%