1979
DOI: 10.1002/crat.19790141216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐Arrthenius Behaviour and Divacancy Contribution in Self‐Diffusion of 64Cu in Cu

Abstract: The self-diffusion of W u in Cu was investigated in the high temperature range (1078 t o 1348 K), upplying the tracer-standard sectioning technique. For the frecluency factor Do and the activation energy Q, we found Do = (0.68 f_ 0 0 : : ; ) ctnZ s-I untl (5, = (2.17 f f 0.02) t:V. A slight bending of the Arrheniiis plot suggests u divacanry contribution to the self-diffusion of copper. Data sets used in an nriiiieriral analysis are in good accord with published results. Mit Hilfe des Tracer-Standardscliic.hte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activation energy is close to the volume self diffusion activation energy for pure copper. Direct radiotracer experiments give the activation energy 211 kJ/mol [8] and 209 kJ/mol [9]. It is also possible to estimate the average distance between source and sink of vacancies using the intercept on the ln(T/η) axis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This activation energy is close to the volume self diffusion activation energy for pure copper. Direct radiotracer experiments give the activation energy 211 kJ/mol [8] and 209 kJ/mol [9]. It is also possible to estimate the average distance between source and sink of vacancies using the intercept on the ln(T/η) axis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to estimate the average distance between source and sink of vacancies using the intercept on the ln(T/η) axis. Taking into account the pre-exponential factors from [8,9] we calculated d ≈ 40 µm. The value is between the thickness foil (18 µm) and average grain size (170 µm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%