2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00105-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-elemental processing in olfactory discrimination tasks needs bilateral input in honeybees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different variants of this Pavlovian protocol have been conceived to study nonelemental olfactory learning in honey bees. In particular, bees effectively learn negative patterning discriminations (A+, B+ vs. AB−; see the Introduction) and their reversed counterpart, positive patterning (A−, B− vs. AB+) (equivalent to the XOR and AND problems, respectively) (32)(33)(34)46). To determine whether MBs are required for both patterning discriminations, we combined these two conditioning problems with local procaine anesthesia to block neural activity specifically in these brain centers in a transient and reversible way (37,38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different variants of this Pavlovian protocol have been conceived to study nonelemental olfactory learning in honey bees. In particular, bees effectively learn negative patterning discriminations (A+, B+ vs. AB−; see the Introduction) and their reversed counterpart, positive patterning (A−, B− vs. AB+) (equivalent to the XOR and AND problems, respectively) (32)(33)(34)46). To determine whether MBs are required for both patterning discriminations, we combined these two conditioning problems with local procaine anesthesia to block neural activity specifically in these brain centers in a transient and reversible way (37,38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They require the ability to establish configural associations: i.e., unique conjunctive representations of compound stimuli that can then be treated as different from the simple sum of their elements. Honey bees, like mammals, learn patterning discriminations using nonelemental strategies (32)(33)(34)46), a capacity that seems absent in other insect models of learning and memory (31,59). Prior work on patterning discriminations in bees focused on negative rather than on positive patterning (32-34) because elemental accounts exist for the latter but not for the former (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maintenance of MB architecture, as we demonstrated, may allow workers to remain adept at task performance. Hydroxyurea lesioning of the MB in honeybees and fruit flies results in diminished olfactory discrimination and impairment of associative learning, respectively [de Belle and Heisenberg, 1994;Komischke et al, 2003]. Similar chemical manipulations of brain development in P. dentata would be insightful.…”
Section: Neural and Behavioral Robustness And Brain Modularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of honeybee olfactory learning, computer simulations and experiments such as negative patterning and its variants (Deisig et al, 2001(Deisig et al, , 2002(Deisig et al, , 2003 showed that olfactory compound learning and processing in bees was consistent with the uniquecue theory. A unique cue is generated when bees receive olfactory input to both brain sides, since bilateral olfactory input is required to solve a negative patterning task (Komischke et al, 2003). Assuming that the elements interfered with each other is implied in a modified unique-cue theory (Redhead and Pearce, 1995), which provided the best account for all the behavioral results available (Deisig et al, 2003;Lachnit et al, 2004).…”
Section: Nonelemental Forms Of Associative Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%