2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-48721-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method Applied to Full-Order and Reduced Problems in Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Comparison and Perspectives

Abstract: In this work, Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) based on non-intrusive Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) is applied to the CFD problem of the flow past an airfoil with parameterized angle of attack and inflow velocity. To limit the computational cost associated with each of the simulations required by the non-intrusive UQ algorithm used, we resort to a Reduced Order Model (ROM) based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD)-Galerkin approach. A first set of results is presented to characterize the accuracy of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the lifting function method, it is often problematic to determine suitable lifting functions that are physical. Ideally, the lifting functions are orthogonal to each other as in the work of Hijazi et al [53] who studied a flow past an airfoil with parameterized angle of attack and inflow velocity. They used two lifting functions with orthogonal inflow conditions: ζ c 1 = (0,1) and ζ c 2 = (1,0) on Γ i , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the lifting function method, it is often problematic to determine suitable lifting functions that are physical. Ideally, the lifting functions are orthogonal to each other as in the work of Hijazi et al [53] who studied a flow past an airfoil with parameterized angle of attack and inflow velocity. They used two lifting functions with orthogonal inflow conditions: ζ c 1 = (0,1) and ζ c 2 = (1,0) on Γ i , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the solution of the stationary version of the considered problem can be computed [49]. Two other common approaches are solving a non-homogeneous Stokes problem [46,50,51] or solving a potential flow problem [52,53].…”
Section: The Lifting Function Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these circumstances, an additional effort has to be made for the treatment of the inhomogeneous velocity boundary conditions at the ROM level. The common strategies for tackling this issue are the lifting function method [39,40,50] and the penalty method [21,5,13,59,87]. A brief description of the two methods will be given and then the strategy of incorporating them inside the PINN formulation will be addressed.…”
Section: The Reduced Order Model (Rom)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the top image, we show the wall shear stress along the x direction, at time t = 50s, computed using full-order solver. In the bottom, we show the wall shear stress along x direction reconstructed at time t = 50s using 30 snapshots equispaced in the temporal window [1,30]. solution of a parametric PDE.…”
Section: Proper Orthogonal Decomposition With Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%