2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive brain mapping of motor-related areas of four limbs in patients with clinically isolated syndrome compared to healthy normal controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the correlation between focal white matter (WM) lesions and clinical disability is only modest, a phenomenon which has persisted for many years and is referred to as the clinicoradiological paradox [2]. One of the factors thought to explain this discrepancy is individual variations in brain plasticity and cortical reorganization, which may limit the clinical disability caused by focal lesions [3], [4], [5]. Because of this, interest in other pathological tissue changes, beside WM lesions, has been of interest in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the correlation between focal white matter (WM) lesions and clinical disability is only modest, a phenomenon which has persisted for many years and is referred to as the clinicoradiological paradox [2]. One of the factors thought to explain this discrepancy is individual variations in brain plasticity and cortical reorganization, which may limit the clinical disability caused by focal lesions [3], [4], [5]. Because of this, interest in other pathological tissue changes, beside WM lesions, has been of interest in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigators proposed that reorganization of FC precedes the onset of clinical manifestations of motor dysfunction in MS [Harirchian et al, 2010], and may serve a compensatory role to limit motor disability at earlier stages of disease progression when the lesion burden is presumably lighter [Basile et al, 2013;Roosendaal et al, 2010]. Although there were more people with secondaryprogressive MS in our MI group than in the MP group, lesion loads and global brain atrophy were comparable in the two groups, and did not correlate with motor Normalized volume (upper panel) and mean MTR (lower panel) within brain regions of interest for HC, MP and MI participants were shown with mean and the standard error (SE), adjusted for age and sex.…”
Section: Correlates Of Preserved Motor Function In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there were more people with secondaryprogressive MS in our MI group than in the MP group, lesion loads and global brain atrophy were comparable in the two groups, and did not correlate with motor Normalized volume (upper panel) and mean MTR (lower panel) within brain regions of interest for HC, MP and MI participants were shown with mean and the standard error (SE), adjusted for age and sex. Changes in ipsilateral motor network activity have been linked to upper limb motor function in CIS [Harirchian et al 2010;Pantano et al, 2002] and RRMS [Reddy et al, 2000]. Significant post hoc comparisons were indicated with '*' after applying Tukey HSD test.…”
Section: Correlates Of Preserved Motor Function In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some lesions, when viewed on T1-weighted images, appear hypo-intense compared to surrounding WM ,and the inclusion of T1-weighted imaging may increase the correlation with clinical disability, but only to a limited degree (138,139). Factors believed to explain this discrepancy include cortical reorganisation (140), where other parts of the brain may compensate for focal injury; brain plasticity (141,142), where signal transmissions may use alternative pathways; and the consideration of strategic lesion location (143,144). Subsequently, other pathological changes have been of interest in recent years, including lesions in cortical GM (145,146), changes in deep GM (147,148) and changes in normal appearing white matter (NAWM) (5,(149)(150)(151)(152)(153).…”
Section: Mri In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%