Non-linear, non-monotonic effect of nano-scale roughness on particle deposition in absence of an energy barrier: Experiments and modeling

Abstract

Deposition of colloidal- and nano-scale particles on surfaces is critical to numerous natural and engineered environmental, health, and industrial applications ranging from drinking water treatment to semi-conductor manufacturing. Nano-scale surface roughness-induced hydrodynamic impacts on particle deposition were evaluated in the absence of an energy barrier to deposition in a parallel plate system. A non-linear, non-monotonic relationship between deposition surface roughness and particle deposition flux was observed and a critical roughness size associated with minimum deposition flux or “sag effect” was identified. This effect was more significant for nanoparticles (<1 μm) than for colloids and was numerically simulated using a Convective-Diffusion model and experimentally validated. Inclusion of flow field and hydrodynamic retardation effects explained particle deposition profiles better than when only the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) force was considered. This work provides 1) a first comprehensive framework for describing the hydrodynamic impacts of nano-scale surface roughness on particle deposition by unifying hydrodynamic forces (using the most current approaches for describing flow field profiles and hydrodynamic retardation effects) with appropriately modified expressions for DLVO interaction energies, and gravity forces in one model and 2) a foundation for further describing the impacts of more complicated scales of deposition surface roughness on particle deposition.

Cell adhesion in microchannel multiple constrictions – Evidence of mass transport limitations

“…Theoretically, the number of adhered cells per area ( ⁄ ) is directly related to the cell flux (equation 7) and, consequently, to the experimental Sherwood number [39]:…”

“…A uniform concentration of 0.35 kg•m -3was considered at the antechamber inlet and at the bottom walls, the cell concentration was set to zero since it is assumed that all the cells that arrive at the wall stay instantaneously immobilized and therefore disappear from the dispersed phase. This is the so-called perfect sink model, and it is the most commonly used boundary condition at the collectors surface[24,39,40]. In these wall conditions (i.e.…”

Particle Deposition in Microfluidic Devices at Elevated Temperatures

“…In addition, surface roughness played an important role in particle deposition experiment/ simulation. They conducted another study on deposition of colloidal particles and reported a non-monotonic, non-linear effect of nanoscale roughness on particle deposition without energy barrier using both the convection-diffusion model and parallel-plate chamber experimental system [102]. Their results showed particle deposition flux could reach the minimum value when a critical roughness size was provided.…”

Biological filtration is resilient to wildfire ash-associated organic carbon threats to drinking water treatment

“…32,33 Biological filtration processes range from classical-biofiltration in an otherwise conventional treatment plant (i.e., preceded by coagula-tion/flocculation/clarification and sometimes advanced oxidation processes such as pre-ozonation)-to slow sand filtration (SSF) that is typically operated without chemical or other types of pre-treatments. 28,32 Thus, while they may include physico-chemical filtration that relies on synergies between particle size, media depth, media size, particle destabilization by coagulation, and media roughness, [35][36][37][38] biodegradation, biotransformation, adsorption, and bioregeneration may also contribute to treatment. Critically, however, biological filtration performance is not directly proportional to the amount of biomass present; 31,39,40 thus, lab-and pilot-scale assessments remain critical to demonstrating biological treatment capabilities.…”