2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2021)162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-relativistic and Carrollian limits of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity

Abstract: We construct the non-relativistic and Carrollian versions of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity. In the second order formulation, there are no divergences in the non-relativistic and Carrollian limits. Instead, in the first order formalism, some divergences can be avoided by starting from a relativistic BF theory with (A)dS2 × ℝ gauge algebra. We show how to define the boundary duals of the gravity actions using the method of non-linear realisations and suitable Inverse Higgs constraints. In particular, the non-relativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Covariant actions for Carroll gravity in three and two spacetime dimensions in have also been constructed in[37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariant actions for Carroll gravity in three and two spacetime dimensions in have also been constructed in[37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For BF-theory based on higher-spin gauge symmetry in JT gravity see[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] 3. For a non-relativistic 2d dilaton-gravity setup see the recent papers[59][60][61].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(By contrast, we can have an approximately AdS 2 horizon for w > 3 2 .) The quantity (83) can also be computed in the limits X → 0 and X → ∞. We find σ → 0 in both cases, which means that the center of the spacetime and infinity are constant curvature regions.…”
Section: Ricci Scalarmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…• Other singular limits. Recently, various limits -including non-and ultra-relativistic ones -of the JT model and generalizations thereof were derived [82,83]. The same limits can be applied to generic models (2), as indicated already in [82].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%