2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.84.063829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonclassicality in phase-number uncertainty relations

Abstract: We show that there are nonclassical states with lesser joint fluctuations of phase and number than any classical state. This is rather paradoxical since one would expect classical coherent states to be always of minimum uncertainty. The same result is obtained when we replace phase by a phase-dependent field quadrature. Number and phase uncertainties are assessed using variance and Holevo relation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, since Theorem 1 involves operators of the form e iλ Ô it becomes valuable when the operator Ô does not exist itself (consequences of so called Stone-von Neumann theorem). A particularly interesting example of the number-phase uncertainty [58][59][60] (phase operators are not well defined) has just been described [61] along the lines of Theorem 1. Here we would like to briefly touch upon the broad theory of Loop Quantum Gravity [73], in which the so called Ashtekar connection [62] A i a (x) [74] plays the role of the canonical "position" variable in a field-theoretical sense [75].…”
Section: Proof Let Us Now Outline the Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since Theorem 1 involves operators of the form e iλ Ô it becomes valuable when the operator Ô does not exist itself (consequences of so called Stone-von Neumann theorem). A particularly interesting example of the number-phase uncertainty [58][59][60] (phase operators are not well defined) has just been described [61] along the lines of Theorem 1. Here we would like to briefly touch upon the broad theory of Loop Quantum Gravity [73], in which the so called Ashtekar connection [62] A i a (x) [74] plays the role of the canonical "position" variable in a field-theoretical sense [75].…”
Section: Proof Let Us Now Outline the Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] is a quite interesting formulation particularly suited to phase-angle variables. We also show that this encounters fundamental ambiguities when contrasting different slightly different alternative implementations, as it also holds for other approaches [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…(12) we get that the minimum uncertainty states are those pure states with s y = 0 and |s x | = |s z | = 1/ √ 2. On the other hand, the states with s y = 0 and |s x | = 0 or |s z | = 0 are of maximum uncertainty, contrary to the predictions of the sum relations (10) and (13).…”
Section: A Example: Qubitmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a scheme has been suggested for preparation of superposed state (1) in a cavity [27]. Therefore, because of the fact that the construction of various classes of nonclassical states [28][29][30], as well as (and more importantly) their theoretical generation [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], are still of great interest for research in quantum optics field, in this paper we motivate to propose a method to generate a few classes of nonclassical states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%