2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18061955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Bridge Decks with Automated Acoustic Scanning System and Ground Penetrating Radar

Abstract: Delamanintions and reinforcement corrosion are two common problems in concrete bridge decks. No single nondestructive testing method (NDT) is able to provide comprehensive characterization of these defects. In this work, two NDT methods, acoustic scanning and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), were used to image a straight concrete bridge deck and a curved intersection ramp bridge. An acoustic scanning system has been developed for rapid delamination mapping. The system consists of metal-ball excitation sources, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold values λ is calculated by The Visu Shrink threshold which is defined as Eq. 21: (21) where: σ n is the standard deviation of Gaussian white noise with a mean of zero. N is the length of the signal.…”
Section: Denoising With the Shearlet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The threshold values λ is calculated by The Visu Shrink threshold which is defined as Eq. 21: (21) where: σ n is the standard deviation of Gaussian white noise with a mean of zero. N is the length of the signal.…”
Section: Denoising With the Shearlet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-penetrating radar (GPR), as a non-destructive, sufficient detection, simple operation, rapids ampling, high-resolution geophysical tool, has raised a substantial interest in non-destructive testing workers. This tool has been considered reliable for evaluation of geological disaster survey (Tang et al 2011), concrete bridge decks (Sun et al 2018), road investigations (Poikajärvi et al 2012), dielectric structures testing (Ivashov et al 2018) and doi:/10.37763/wr.1336-4561/65.1.001012 underground structure detection (Lai et al 2018). Meanwhile, it has been gradually applied to the non destructive testing (NDT) of trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References N M Delamination IE [20,26,27,29,30,40,41,[43][44][45]48,53,55,56,61,62,68] 17 34% GPR [19,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27]29,[31][32][33][34][35]38,40,43,45,46,48 The results are also illustrated in Figures 6-9 for clarity. The charts clearly show the NDT method(s) that is (are) most appropriate for each damage type in closure joints, as denoted by the higher percentage(s).…”
Section: Type Of Defectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, ground penetrating radar (GPR) has been widely employed for early detection of underground cavities, which are most likely propagating to sinkholes, thanks to its fast scanning speed, nondestructive inspection, and 3D imaging capabilities [10][11][12]. GPR transmitters emit electromagnetic waves into the underground at several spatial positions along the scanning direction, and GPR receivers measure the reflected signals to establish 2D GPR image called a radargram, also known as a B-scan image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%