2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000206343.06995.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Cerclage for the Management of Cervical Incompetence: A Prospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Antczak-Judycka A, et al (2003) compararam 35 pacientes tratadas com pressário em relação a 22 pacientes tratadas com cerclagem cervical, onde foi analisado que ambos os métodos mostraram-se igualmente eficazes em termos de prolongamento da gravidez. Os autores observaram que o uso de pessário está associado a menor frequência de trabalho de parto prematuro e prolongamento de idade gestacional em mulheres que apresentam colo do útero incompetente ou em risco de trabalho de parto ( LUDMIR J, SEHDEV HM, et al, 2002;ACHARYA G, et al 2006;ARABIN B, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tratamentounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antczak-Judycka A, et al (2003) compararam 35 pacientes tratadas com pressário em relação a 22 pacientes tratadas com cerclagem cervical, onde foi analisado que ambos os métodos mostraram-se igualmente eficazes em termos de prolongamento da gravidez. Os autores observaram que o uso de pessário está associado a menor frequência de trabalho de parto prematuro e prolongamento de idade gestacional em mulheres que apresentam colo do útero incompetente ou em risco de trabalho de parto ( LUDMIR J, SEHDEV HM, et al, 2002;ACHARYA G, et al 2006;ARABIN B, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tratamentounclassified
“…Hospital Universitário Getúlio Vargas (HUGV), Manaus -AM. *E-mail: biancam_macedo@hotmail.com2 Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus -AM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device has been modi ed and improved by Arabin. 35 Nowadays both, progesterone and pessaries have been used to prevent PTB in patients with a short cervix, although the e ciency of these treatments is extensively debated in the literature with disputable results for vaginal progesterone [36][37][38][39][40][41] , cervical pessary [42][43][44][45][46][47][48] , and their combination or comparisons. [49][50][51][52] This study was designed to explore the impact of the cervical conization size (CCS) followed by cervical length (CL) changes on the PTB rates of asymptomatic singleton pregnancies compared to POs in women without cervical conization and to estimate the e ciency of vaginal progesterone alone next to its combination with a pessary to prevent PTB in patients with a short cervix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcome measures are time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 32 and 37 weeks, days of admission in neonatal intensive care unit, maternal morbidity, maternal admission days for preterm birth and costs [66]. Only one small study reported some positive effect of pessary insertion in twins [67].…”
Section: Pessariesmentioning
confidence: 99%