1981
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380200019003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Detection of Carotid Stenosis Following Endarterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of noninvasive diagnostic techniques following carotid endarterectomy has been reported by Kremen et al 9 and Cantelmo et al 10 Kremen and associates, 9 using OPG-G, observed a 9.8% incidence of recurrent stenosis following 173 endarterectomies; only 2% were symptomatic. Cantelmo et al 10 combined ultrasonic arteriography with oculoplethysmography, reporting a 12% incidence of restenosis; 62% were asymptomatic, and 25% of the stenoses were hemodynamically insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The use of noninvasive diagnostic techniques following carotid endarterectomy has been reported by Kremen et al 9 and Cantelmo et al 10 Kremen and associates, 9 using OPG-G, observed a 9.8% incidence of recurrent stenosis following 173 endarterectomies; only 2% were symptomatic. Cantelmo et al 10 combined ultrasonic arteriography with oculoplethysmography, reporting a 12% incidence of restenosis; 62% were asymptomatic, and 25% of the stenoses were hemodynamically insignificant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Cantelmo et al 40 reported that "a high proportion" of patients with recurrent stenosis had hyperlipidemia, although this was not defined. Cossman et al 4 ' found that of seven patients with restenosis within 24 months of carotid endarterectomy, six had Type II or Type IV hyperlipoproteinemia.…”
Section: Restenosis Following Endarterectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports regarding the incidence of recurrent disease or stenosis of the ICA following endarterectomy have varied widely with values from 1 to 28 % (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). This variation not only reflects the method of diagnosis, but presumably also the expertise of the neurosurgical team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%