2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-017-2449-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Analysis of Deep Beam Resting on Linear and Nonlinear Random Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of soil's subgrade reaction k w is considered constant for linear elastic soil. Thus for elastic nonlinear soil model, the coefficient k w for an element e is [54]:…”
Section: Nonlinear Winkler-pasternack Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The coefficient of soil's subgrade reaction k w is considered constant for linear elastic soil. Thus for elastic nonlinear soil model, the coefficient k w for an element e is [54]:…”
Section: Nonlinear Winkler-pasternack Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k soil = k w = k s and c(D i ) is the variance function [54,55] which depends on the spatial correlation function q(x) and determined by Vanmarcke [46] as:…”
Section: Spatial Variability Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this context Kazi Tani et al [25] presented stochastic finite difference method to study the linear response of pipeline resting on elastic perfectly plastic soil. Moreover, Seguini and Nedjar [26][27][28][29] made an important study and employed the finite element method based on the Von Kármán assumption, combined to the theory of the local average to assess the spatial variability effects and shear deformation on the large deflection of pipe and deep beam resting on linear and nonlinear random soil where the coefficient of subgrade reaction ksoil is considered variable (see Section 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%