2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-009-9595-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear dynamics of an inclined beam subjected to a moving load

Abstract: In this paper, the nonlinear dynamic response of an inclined pinned-pinned beam with a constant cross section, finite length subjected to a concentrated vertical force traveling with a constant velocity is investigated. The study is focused on the mode summation method and also on frequency analysis of the governing PDEs equations of motion. Furthermore, the steady-state response is studied by applying the multiple scales method. The nonlinear response of the beam is obtained by solving two coupled nonlinear P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose that point p 1 is the position of the impact point predicted by the rigid type of analysis and point p 2 the same point predicted by the nonlinear analysis under beam's inclination angle of θ rigid and beam's end slope of θ endslope (see Fig. 10) [25]. Table 2 • , and keeping all other parameters the same, the difference in target position with respect to the rigid beam assumption considering both weightless beam and the self-weight beam models are 125.38 m and 182.76 m, respectively which have about 0.83% error and 1.21% error, respectively (see Fig.…”
Section: Case Study: Accuracy Of Targeting Of Repetitive Projectiles mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suppose that point p 1 is the position of the impact point predicted by the rigid type of analysis and point p 2 the same point predicted by the nonlinear analysis under beam's inclination angle of θ rigid and beam's end slope of θ endslope (see Fig. 10) [25]. Table 2 • , and keeping all other parameters the same, the difference in target position with respect to the rigid beam assumption considering both weightless beam and the self-weight beam models are 125.38 m and 182.76 m, respectively which have about 0.83% error and 1.21% error, respectively (see Fig.…”
Section: Case Study: Accuracy Of Targeting Of Repetitive Projectiles mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear analysis for beams has been studied in [24] using Newmark-β method to solve the discrete equations of motion for thin and thick beam theories neglecting the longitudinal displacement. The nonlinear dynamic analysis of an inclined Euler-Bernoulli beam with finite length subjected to a concentrated moving force has been studied in [25]. The nonlinear coupled PDEs of motion were solved by using mode summation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dmitriev [12] presented the early analytical solution on the longitudinal vibration of the beam subjected to a constant axial force and fixed axially in one end. Mamandi et al [13] studied analytically not only the transverse vibration, but also the longitudinal vibration of inclined beam subjected to a moving load. The effects of the transverse or axial elastic constraint on the longitudinal vibration were also considered in the researches of Nguyen and Duhamel [14], Wu [15], Toth and Ruge [16], but the means adopted in their works are the finite element method, not the analytical solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chaotic behavior was investigated by utilizing the Poincare´maps, Fourier spectra, and Lyapunov exponents. The nonlinear dynamic response of an inclined beam subjected to a concentrated vertical force traveling with a constant velocity was investigated in [3]. Two nonlinear coupled equations of longitudinal and transverse motion of the beam were solved using the multiple scales method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%