49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2010.5717390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear gain in online prediction of blood glucose profile in type 1 diabetic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…-autoregressive with exogenous input models exploiting information on CHO and insulin therapy 11,12 -autoregressive with moving average with exogenous inputs models accounting for food intake, physical activity, emotional stimuli, and lifestyle; 13 physical activity and insulin on board information; 14 and insulin and CHO information 15 -latent variable-based predictors 16 -random forests, support vector-based algorithms, and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-autoregressive with exogenous input models exploiting information on CHO and insulin therapy 11,12 -autoregressive with moving average with exogenous inputs models accounting for food intake, physical activity, emotional stimuli, and lifestyle; 13 physical activity and insulin on board information; 14 and insulin and CHO information 15 -latent variable-based predictors 16 -random forests, support vector-based algorithms, and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- autoregressive with exogenous input models exploiting information on CHO and insulin therapy 11,12…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝑦 𝐴 (𝑡) = −𝑎 1 𝑦(𝑡 − 1) − ⋯ − 𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑦(𝑡 − 𝑛𝑎) + 𝑏 0 𝑢(𝑡) + 𝑏 1 𝑢(𝑡 − 1) + ⋯ + 𝑏 𝑛𝑏 𝑢(𝑡 − 1) + 𝑒(𝑡) (23) Next, a regression matrix, 𝜑, is created that consists of the inputs and the outputs as:…”
Section: B Steiglitz-mcbride Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach is the block structure system identification, such as the autoregressive integrated moving average [21], best linear approximation [22], normalized least mean square [23], polynomial non-linear state-space [24], Bayesian nonlinear stochastic [25], blind nonlinear identification [26], nonlinear least square [27] and nonlinear linear fractional representation [22], [24], [27], [28]. Moreover, there are review papers that compare the results of these prediction methods from different points of view such as the accuracy, sensitivity, and prediction horizon [3], [6], [29], [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient-specific ARX models both batch-wise and recursively identified from nine patients data records by Finan et al [39] showed a mean 30-min prediction error RMSE of 26 mg/dL. An ARX model with a nonlinear forgetting factor scaled according to the glucose range was considered in CastilloEstrada et al [11,12], and a 45-min prediction horizon showed good results. A feedforward neural network (NN) was exploited in [13] and tested on 10 real datasets, incorporating, in addition to CGM data, other inputs such as SMBG readings, information on insulin, meal, hypo-and hyperglycemia symptoms, lifestyle, activity and emotions and predict glucose values up to 75 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%