2004
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Inversion with Quadratic Function Approaching Method for Magnetotelluric Data

Abstract: We present a new technique for inverting magnetotelluric sounding (MT) data by introducing the quadratic function approaching scheme, which is originally used in nonlinear optimization, to MT data inversion. The quadratic function approaching method (QFAM) takes the advantage that the quadratic function has a single extreme value. It avoids leading to an inversion solution for local minimum and ensures the solution for global minimization of the objective function. The method does not need calculation of sensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2017) proposed a new joint inversion strategy, which uses the existing inversion program for the single inversion of different models, and the model constraints are only introduced through cross‐gradient minimization between different models after each iteration. This strategy decouples the data fitting process and structural constraint process, which overcomes the problem of finding adequate relative scaling between different data sets (Bouchedda et al., 2012; L. Gan et al., 2022; Heincke et al., 2017; Zhu & Harris, 2015). The balance between data fitting and structural similarity is achieved by adding the model perturbations from single inversions to constrain the process of the cross‐gradient minimization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2017) proposed a new joint inversion strategy, which uses the existing inversion program for the single inversion of different models, and the model constraints are only introduced through cross‐gradient minimization between different models after each iteration. This strategy decouples the data fitting process and structural constraint process, which overcomes the problem of finding adequate relative scaling between different data sets (Bouchedda et al., 2012; L. Gan et al., 2022; Heincke et al., 2017; Zhu & Harris, 2015). The balance between data fitting and structural similarity is achieved by adding the model perturbations from single inversions to constrain the process of the cross‐gradient minimization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its resolution is the lowest. In the model solved by QFAM [32] , this low resistivity layer is imaged but the resolution is lower than OCCAM and ARIA. The inversion results of ARIA and OCCAM are good compared with the original model, and ARIA is better than OCCAM.…”
Section: One-dimensional Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015) applied trans‐dimensional inversion for CSEM data in the German North Sea. Based on the Bayesian sampling method, Yang and Hu (2008) combined a weighted matrix with reliability in the data space to complement the probabilistic analysis of magnetotelluric data with noise. Minsley (2011) designed a trans‐dimensional Bayesian MCMC algorithm for frequency‐domain electromagnetic data inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%