2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13709-0_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonnegative Coupled Matrix Tensor Factorization for Smart City Spatiotemporal Pattern Mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The runtime of the method was improved by utilizing a threshold algorithm that separates the data into smaller regions and calculates the top-recommendation for each region. Recently, N-CMTF was applied to predict spatiotemporal patterns using Greedy Coordinate Descent (GCD) [2]. The method highlighted the scalability issues with N-CMTF particularly in the presence of high sparse data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The runtime of the method was improved by utilizing a threshold algorithm that separates the data into smaller regions and calculates the top-recommendation for each region. Recently, N-CMTF was applied to predict spatiotemporal patterns using Greedy Coordinate Descent (GCD) [2]. The method highlighted the scalability issues with N-CMTF particularly in the presence of high sparse data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X 1 is the mode-1 matricization of the tensor. (11) can be rewritten using (12) and (13) as follows: (2) . (14) For simplicity, each element of the gradient G is represented as:…”
Section: Gradient Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, the short texts from social media like Twitter can induce sparseness to the tensor representation. The state-of-the-art factorization algorithms may fail to effectively learn the spatio-temporal patterns in the presence of noise and sparsity present in social media data [7], [8]. Finally, the larger data size introduces efficiency issues in factorization process [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%