2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2369708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Estimation of Cumulative Incidence Functions for Competing Risks Data with Missing Cause of Failure

Abstract: In this paper, we develop a fully nonparametric approach for the estimation of the cumulative incidence function with Missing At Random right-censored competing risks data. We obtain results on the pointwise asymptotic normality as well as the uniform convergence rate of the proposed nonparametric estimator. A simulation study that serves two purposes is provided. First, it illustrates in details how to implement our proposed nonparametric estimator. Secondly, it facilitates a comparison of the nonparametric e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing estimators for competing risks data with the event category missing at random can be roughly categorized into two groups. The first group would be the methods which utilize only the observations with nonmissing event type and weight the contribution of each complete observation using the inverse probability weighting scheme (for example, Effraimidis and Dahl, ). The observations with missing event type are used only to estimate the IPW weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing estimators for competing risks data with the event category missing at random can be roughly categorized into two groups. The first group would be the methods which utilize only the observations with nonmissing event type and weight the contribution of each complete observation using the inverse probability weighting scheme (for example, Effraimidis and Dahl, ). The observations with missing event type are used only to estimate the IPW weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For right censored competing risks data, let T = prefixtruemin false( Y E , Y c , C false) be the observed time, and the uncensoring indicator normalΔ = 1 false( Y F < C false) D where D falsefalse{ 1 , 2 falsefalse} is the type of risk. In this context, the observed sample falsefalse{ false( T i , δ i , ξ i ν i false) , i = 1 , , n falsefalse} can be written as falsefalse{ false( T i , Δ i false) , i = 1 , , n falsefalse}, whereThe CIF of the event of interest E is the probability that a failure of type 1 occurs at or before time t:The CIF of the second competing risk (individual known to be cured) isThe probability of cure is simply the CIF of the competing risk cure ( c) evaluated at infinity or the complementary of the CIF of the event of interest ( E) evaluated at infinity:Equivalently,The conditional version of the estimators of the CIFs in Klein and Moeschberger 41 are the following (also see Effraimidis and Dahl 42 ): …”
Section: Alternative Estimators Of the Cure Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Wang (2010) define inverse‐probability‐weighted estimators in the Cox model with missing failure indicators. Hyun, Lee, and Sun (2012) and Effraimidis and Dahl (2014) use a similar approach in competing risks models with missing cause of failure. Hu, Chen, and Sun (2015) propose inverse‐probability‐weighted estimation in the proportional hazards model with length‐biased failure times and missing covariates.…”
Section: Inverse‐probability‐weighted Stratified Logrank Statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%