2016
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asw001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric identification and maximum likelihood estimation for hidden Markov models

Abstract: Nonparametric identification and maximum likelihood estimation for finite-state hidden Markov models are investigated. We obtain identification of the parameters as well as the order of the Markov chain if the transition probability matrices have full-rank and are ergodic, and if the state-dependent distributions are all distinct, but not necessarily linearly independent. Based on this identification result, we develop a nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation theory. First, we show that the asymptotic con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He focused on the special case of two states, with one of the two state‐dependent distributions modeled parametrically, arguing that this type of model is most relevant for applications, and that computational and identifiability issues may arise in more difficult scenarios. However, it has recently been shown by Gassiat, Cleynen, and Robin () and Alexandrovich and Holzmann () that identifiability in nonparametric HMMs holds under fairly weak conditions, which in practice will usually be satisfied, namely that the transition probability matrix of the unobserved Markov chain has full rank and that the state‐dependent distributions are distinct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He focused on the special case of two states, with one of the two state‐dependent distributions modeled parametrically, arguing that this type of model is most relevant for applications, and that computational and identifiability issues may arise in more difficult scenarios. However, it has recently been shown by Gassiat, Cleynen, and Robin () and Alexandrovich and Holzmann () that identifiability in nonparametric HMMs holds under fairly weak conditions, which in practice will usually be satisfied, namely that the transition probability matrix of the unobserved Markov chain has full rank and that the state‐dependent distributions are distinct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constrained parameters are then obtained by applying the transformation (4). Regarding identifiability in general, and specifically in case of the very flexible model formulation considered here, Alexandrovich et al (2016) show that for the HMM to be identifiable it is sufficient if the t.p.m. has full rank and the state-dependent distributions are distinct, conditions that can be expected to be met in most practical settings where HMMs seem natural candidate models.…”
Section: Model Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , the authors prove that the transition matrix and the emission distributions of a stationary HMM are identifiable (up to state labelling) from the law of three consecutive observations, provided that the transition matrix has full rank and that the emission distributions are linearly independent. Still in the context of HMM, the authors of Alexandrovich et al (2016) use the weaker assumption that the emission distributions are all distinct to obtain identifiability up to state labelling. However, it requires to consider the law of more than three consecutive observations.…”
Section: Identifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In , it is proved that the transition matrix and the emission distributions of a hidden Markov model are identifiable from the joint distribution of three consecutive observations, provided that the transition matrix is non-singular and that the emission distributions are linearly independent. Alexandrovich et al (2016) proved that the identifiability can be obtained with the weaker assumption that the emission distributions are distinct. In this paper, we extend the result of by proving that the SHMM are identifiable up to state labelling, under similar assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%