2005
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonrandom distribution and frequencies of genomic and EST-derived microsatellite markers in rice, wheat, and barley

Abstract: Background: Earlier comparative maps between the genomes of rice (Oryza sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were linkage maps based on cDNA-RFLP markers. The low number of polymorphic RFLP markers has limited the development of dense genetic maps in wheat and the number of available anchor points in comparative maps. Higher density comparative maps using PCR-based anchor markers are necessary to better estimate the conservation of colinearity among cereal genomes. The purpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

34
109
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
34
109
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The data analysis pipeline contained two main self‐developed programs: The first one demultiplexed the reads to each locus and sample with the sequences of the primer loci and index bases of samples added by PCR (Figure S1), and the second one identified alleles via a modified algorithm of MEGASAT (Zhan et al., 2016). The program is distinguished from previous software (Suez et al., 2015; Zhan et al., 2016) because it adopts the Sputnik algorithm (La Rota et al., 2005) to search the microsatellite repeat array. This characteristic enabled the program to function without background information, such as microsatellite sequences and repeat array flank sequences, and only primer sequences are needed to classify reads to loci and index bases for demultiplexing the reads to samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data analysis pipeline contained two main self‐developed programs: The first one demultiplexed the reads to each locus and sample with the sequences of the primer loci and index bases of samples added by PCR (Figure S1), and the second one identified alleles via a modified algorithm of MEGASAT (Zhan et al., 2016). The program is distinguished from previous software (Suez et al., 2015; Zhan et al., 2016) because it adopts the Sputnik algorithm (La Rota et al., 2005) to search the microsatellite repeat array. This characteristic enabled the program to function without background information, such as microsatellite sequences and repeat array flank sequences, and only primer sequences are needed to classify reads to loci and index bases for demultiplexing the reads to samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SSRs, we used modified Sputnik (La Rota, Kantety, Yu, & Sorrells, 2005) to search di‐, tri‐, tetra‐, and pena‐nucleotide unit SSRs, and Primer3 (Untergasser et al., 2012) was then used to design the primers. For the SNPs, we first use Bowtie2 (Langmead & Salzberg, 2012) for mapping clean reads to transcripts and then called SNPs using SAMtools (Li et al., 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was a preponderance of AT, TA and AAG for di and trinucleotide motifs, similar to cotton ESTs (Park et al 2005) and Arabidopsis (Cardle et al 2000). However, other plant species such as wheat, rice and barley (La Rota et al 2005) differ in their lower frequency of these motifs and a higher frequency of CGC and CCG motifs. The bases C and G rarely cooccur in our SSR motifs and this may be a distinguishing feature between monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarmente Aggarwal et al 15 Tanto para Iapar 59 e CaHT o motivo mais abundante foi da classe (AT) n como representado nas tabelas 2 e 3. Os resultados obtidos para ambas cultivares neste estudo reforçam o que foi descrito por La Rota et al 18 e Cardle et al 19 , no qual os motivos poli AT são os mais encontrados na maioria dos genomas de plantas. Além disso, a classe (AT) n foi um dos mais frequentes dinucleotídeos relatados por Aggarwall et al 15 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified