2015
DOI: 10.5860/lrts.59n1.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on Operations: Combining Citation Studies and Usage Statistics to Build a Stronger Collection

Abstract: Citation studies and analyses of usage statistics are two approaches academic librarians take to determine if their journal collections support the needs of research faculty. Librarians at a small, regional liberal arts university compiled a list of faculty journal publications covering a thirteen-year span from four academic departments—nursing, chemistry, biology, and mathematics—and, from these publications, generated a list of the journals that were cited. As expected, this university’s faculty members pub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The COUNTER standard offers a consistent format and the ability to compare statistics from multiple providers, allowing for the calculation of the critical cost-per-use data point. 7 Previous studies validate the metric by demonstrating how COUNTER data correlate significantly with other usage data figures like proxy logs, link resolver statistics, and web analytics. 8 However, despite its usefulness and widespread adoption in libraries, current literature also reveals several limitations with COUNTER.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The COUNTER standard offers a consistent format and the ability to compare statistics from multiple providers, allowing for the calculation of the critical cost-per-use data point. 7 Previous studies validate the metric by demonstrating how COUNTER data correlate significantly with other usage data figures like proxy logs, link resolver statistics, and web analytics. 8 However, despite its usefulness and widespread adoption in libraries, current literature also reveals several limitations with COUNTER.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As electronic resources have become a constant in libraries, the tools and methods to complete citation analysis have changed over time, and vary from study to study. Some librarians manually pull citation data from indexing databases like Web of Science or Scopus and analyze it themselves (De Groote, Blecic, & Martin, 2013;Kimball, Stephens, Hubbard, & Pickett, 2013;Wical & Vandenbark, 2015). Others, rely on purchasing data from indexing companies such as Thomson Reuters (now Clarivate Analytics) (Chew, Schoenborn, Stemper, & Lilyard, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Review Collection Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cílem bylo zjistit, zda fakulta poskytuje přístupy k časopisům, které jsou potřebné pro vědeckou činnost jejich výzkumných pracovníků. Tato studie publikovaná v časopisu Library Resources & Technical Services (Wical, 2015) přináší ukázku pokročilé analýzy statistik v kombinaci s jinými zdroji, využitelnou při akvizici e-zdrojů.…”
Section: Odpověďunclassified