2014
DOI: 10.2217/cns.14.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel approaches for quantifying protein biomarkers in gliomas: benefits and pitfalls

Abstract: The therapeutic paradigm of gliomas is changing from a general approach towards an individualized and targeted approach. Accordingly, the search for prognostic and predictive biomarkers, as well as the demand for quantitative, feasible and robust methods for biomarker analysis increases. We find that software classifiers can identify and quantify the expression of a given biomarker within different subcellular compartments and that such classifiers can exclude frequently occurring nontumor cells, thereby avoid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in both studies semi-quantitative pathologist-based scoring systems was used and no statistical comparison was made. To provide a more unbiased quantification approach we used blinded quantitative stereology and systematic random sampling [29]. Moreover, we focused on and compared astrocytic tumors only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in both studies semi-quantitative pathologist-based scoring systems was used and no statistical comparison was made. To provide a more unbiased quantification approach we used blinded quantitative stereology and systematic random sampling [29]. Moreover, we focused on and compared astrocytic tumors only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omission of primary antibodies served as negative controls as well as controls for nonspecific staining induced by the detection systems alone. Reactions were evaluated digitally by measuring the staining intensities of the spheroids using the VIS software (Visiopharm, Hørsholm, Denmark) [ 46 , 47 , 52 ]. Briefly, 20 randomly selected spheroids were marked as regions of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To monitor stem cell differentiation, we analyzed the expression of three stem cell markers, CD133 [ 32–38 ], nestin [ 33 , 37–43 ] and musashi-1 [ 35 , 38 , 42 , 44 , 45 ]. Expression of all markers was investigated by chromogenic immunohistochemical staining and quantified digitally in order to obtain precise less observer-dependent measurements [ 46 , 47 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sections stained with IgG or sections where primary antibodies were omitted were devoid of staining. IHC double staining was performed using the BenchMark fully automated staining instrument and the Vectastain Universal Elite ABC kit (Vector Labs, USA) [ 14 ]. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Bie & Berntsen, Herlev, Denmark).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%