2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel developments in non-invasive imaging of peripheral arterial disease with CT: experience with state-of-the-art, ultra-high-resolution CT and subtraction imaging

Abstract: Despite advances, challenges remain for less invasive imaging of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) using computed tomography (CT) angiography. The application of dual-energy imaging to PAOD has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this application; however, severe arteriosclerosis with heavy arterial wall calcification still hampers definitive lesion characterisation, especially in distal and smaller arteries. Recently an ultra-high resolution scanner has been introduced. In combinati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with conventional HRCT scanners, the advantages of U-HRCT scanners used in daily clinical care were first reported for vascular imaging, with advantages such as clear visualization of very small intracranial arteries and coronary arteries, and in addition, the artery of Adamkiewicz. [18][19][20][21][22] The advantages of U-HRCT scanners for temporal bone imaging were also reported, with advantages such as increased detail of the normal structures of the middle ear. 25 The improvement in visualization of small vessels/structures as provided by U-HRCT scanners over conventional HRCT scanners is based on an improved spatial resolution by a detector of a very small size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with conventional HRCT scanners, the advantages of U-HRCT scanners used in daily clinical care were first reported for vascular imaging, with advantages such as clear visualization of very small intracranial arteries and coronary arteries, and in addition, the artery of Adamkiewicz. [18][19][20][21][22] The advantages of U-HRCT scanners for temporal bone imaging were also reported, with advantages such as increased detail of the normal structures of the middle ear. 25 The improvement in visualization of small vessels/structures as provided by U-HRCT scanners over conventional HRCT scanners is based on an improved spatial resolution by a detector of a very small size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) scanners with ultrasmall detector elements (0.25 × 0.25 mm) have recently been introduced into clinical practice. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The size of the detector element in the U-HRCT scanner is 50% smaller than those in conventional HRCT scanners in all 3 directions (x, y, and z axes). Use of the ultra-small detector along with an ultra-small focal spot provided by the X-ray tube obtains the highest spatial resolution in CT images, as evidenced by improved visualization of small lung lesions and small vessels in the brain and body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) scanning with ultra-small detector elements (0.25 Â 0.25 mm) is currently achievable using the 160-row U-HRCT scanner (Aquilion Precision V R ; Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan) [8]. U-HRCT affords better spatial resolution than multi-detector row CT, and has been successfully introduced into clinical use, for example, for imaging small lung lesions and small vessels in the brain and body [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, distinction between medial and intimal calcification is not possible with current resolutions of CT. Intimal and medial calcification are different pathologies, with different risk factors for developing CVD 246,247 . Additionally, microcalcification (< 15 μm) cannot be assessed, as the resolution of CT is some 200 μm 222, 248,249 .…”
Section: Calcification Imaging By Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%