2006
DOI: 10.1093/ietfec/e89-a.6.1578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Iterative Image Reconstruction Algorithm for Electrical Capacitance Tomography: Directional Algebraic Reconstruction Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the images reconstructed using the LBP method are often deformed, this algorithm remains the most widely used one due to its simplicity and rapidity. Iterative algorithms such as Landweber's iteration method [19] and algebraic reconstruction technique [20] can create significantly better images than can non-iterative reconstruction algorithms. Iterative image reconstruction methods during the practicality require long reconstruction time.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the images reconstructed using the LBP method are often deformed, this algorithm remains the most widely used one due to its simplicity and rapidity. Iterative algorithms such as Landweber's iteration method [19] and algebraic reconstruction technique [20] can create significantly better images than can non-iterative reconstruction algorithms. Iterative image reconstruction methods during the practicality require long reconstruction time.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This back projection is conceptually very simple and straightforward; however, many assumptions are engaged in the algorithm, and in fact the image reconstruction performance may not be so plausible. To improve the image quality some modifications of the sensitivity matrix have been suggested (Kim, Choi, & Kim, 2006;Reinecke & Mewes, 1997;Villares et al, 2012).…”
Section: Image Reconstruction Based On Transmission Tomography Algorimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the solution of the governing equation with the boundary conditions, the constraints, and the complete electrode model, usually, the finite element method is preferred since it can easily handle the pixel-wise conductivity distribution (Brenner & Scott, 1994;Hinton & Owen, 1979;Vauhkonen 1997). The finite element formulation is well established, and many references and computer programs are available (Adler et al, 2009;Kim, Choi, & Kim, 2006;Vauhkonen, 1997). One of the most common approaches used to solve the above nonlinear least squares problems is the GausseNewton algorithm.…”
Section: Gradient-based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations