1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.332502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel monochromator concept for sagittal micro-focusing of undulator radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be mentioned that the same volume of the crystal should be irradiated during data collection, which may require defocusing the beam, as was performed in the present study. Indeed, if different parts of a crystal were irradiated variably (Schulze-Briese et al, 2005), it would not be possible to consider each individual intensity measurement to correspond to a given dose and thus to a given state of radiation damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be mentioned that the same volume of the crystal should be irradiated during data collection, which may require defocusing the beam, as was performed in the present study. Indeed, if different parts of a crystal were irradiated variably (Schulze-Briese et al, 2005), it would not be possible to consider each individual intensity measurement to correspond to a given dose and thus to a given state of radiation damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the hard X-ray monochromators of the SLS have a vertical offset of typically 50 mm. In addition, the current design includes a sagittal bender (Schulze-Briese et al, 1998), which bends the second crystal in the sagittal direction with respect to the Figure 1 A schematic illustration of the design for hard X-ray ID beamlines at SLS 2.0 (a top view). After the undulator and front end, the beamline is composed of a section that accommodates one or two monochromators with the same horizontal beam offset, with only one to be used at any one time.…”
Section: Monochromator Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the horizontal beamline acceptance, the transverse footprint on the sagittal crystal is of 10 mm, which places this bender between the normal ESRF bending magnet sagittal bender [6] equipped with ribs and adapted for horizontal beam sizes of 100 mm and the one designed at SLS for undulator sources [7] dealing with horizontal beam sizes less than 4 mm. …”
Section: Dcmmentioning
confidence: 99%