Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 64

Core-coupled protons,f7/2intruder states, and competingg9/2proton and neutron structures inChiara1, Stefanescu2, Walters3 et al. 2012Phys. Rev. C

“…5) are excluded from the figure because of the noted ambiguity of their parity assignments. 65 Cu compared to the ground-state bands of the even-even Ni [58] and Zn [59] isotones and shell-model calculations using the JUN45 and jj44b…”

Nuclear mean-square charge radii of63,64,66,68−82Ga nuclei: No anomalous behavior atN=32Procter1, Billowes2, Bissell3 et al. 2012Phys. Rev. C301210View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…, were extracted and compared with the known reference value [2] of +5.592 (9). The results from this analysis are presented in Table III.…”

“…This paper will present the charge radii values of the 63,64,66,68−82 Ga nuclei along with previously unmeasured nuclear gs spin and moment values. + /2 + energy levels in Zn (circles) and Ge (triangles) isotopes [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Noticeable effects are observed at N = 50 and N = 38; however, no clear effects are seen below N = 38.…”

Erratum:Ni62(n,γ)andNi63(nLederer1, Massimi2, Berthoumieux3 et al. 2015Phys. Rev. C5020View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…This background can be neglected in this measurement because the first excited state in 62 Ni and the first excited state above the detector threshold of 250 keV in 63 Ni are above 0.5 MeV. In both cases population of those levels was not possible in the investigated neutron energy range [41].…”