2015
DOI: 10.1071/zo15028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numbat nirvana: conservation ecology of the endangered numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) (Marsupialia : Myrmecobiidae) reintroduced to Scotia and Yookamurra Sanctuaries, Australia

Abstract: Females had home ranges of 28.3 ± 6.8 ha and males 96.6 ± 18.2 ha, which leads to an 43 estimated sustainable population or carrying capacity of 413-502 at Scotia. Captive bred 44 animals from Perth Zoo had a high mortality rate upon reintroduction at Scotia due to raptor 45 predation and starvation. The habitat preferences for mallee with a shrub understory appear 46 to be driven by termite availability, and other reintroduced ecosystem engineers appear to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three of the eight species studied were reintroduced. Because these engineers were reintroduced after long periods of regional extinction, it was possible to observe how the presence of burrowing species not only facilitated the survival and establishment of other threatened species (Hayward et al., ), but was also strongly associated with changes in ground‐dwelling arthropod, fungal and microbial communities (Clarke et al., ; Eldridge et al., ; Silvey et al., ), and changes in abundance and behaviour that affected the function of other engineers (Coggan, Hayward, & Gibb, ). The role of all burrowing species (particularly vertebrates) in supporting diversity by providing shelter is reflected in observations globally (see reviews by Davidson et al., ; Root‐Bernstein & Ebensperger, ).…”
Section: What Are the Impacts Of Ecosystem Engineers In Terrestrial Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three of the eight species studied were reintroduced. Because these engineers were reintroduced after long periods of regional extinction, it was possible to observe how the presence of burrowing species not only facilitated the survival and establishment of other threatened species (Hayward et al., ), but was also strongly associated with changes in ground‐dwelling arthropod, fungal and microbial communities (Clarke et al., ; Eldridge et al., ; Silvey et al., ), and changes in abundance and behaviour that affected the function of other engineers (Coggan, Hayward, & Gibb, ). The role of all burrowing species (particularly vertebrates) in supporting diversity by providing shelter is reflected in observations globally (see reviews by Davidson et al., ; Root‐Bernstein & Ebensperger, ).…”
Section: What Are the Impacts Of Ecosystem Engineers In Terrestrial Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary research into ecosystem engineers has focussed on their impact on species diversity and, increasingly, on their potential as agents of ecosystem restoration (Byers et al., ). Ecosystem engineers are anticipated to speed ecological recovery by reinstating ecosystem functions following species declines (Manning, Eldridge, & Jones, ) and by facilitating the re‐establishment of other threatened species (Hayward et al., ). Functional extinctions of engineer species are also an increasing point of concern for conservation and ecosystem restoration (McCullough Hennessy et al., ; Silvey, Hayward, & Gibb, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few reintroduction studies have included site-level replication (e.g. Hayward et al, 2015), thus we consider the influence of site-specific factors, particularly that of land-use history, upon termite reactions to mammal reintroduction. The new knowledge will contribute to developing theories of environmental effects on biotic interactions (Schemske et al, 2009), and inform conservation practices which employ reintroduction of ecosystem engineer species (Manning et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies demonstrate that consumers often use engineered ecological structures as refuges (e.g. Hayward et al., ; Hendy, Michie, & Taylor, ) and that this in turn can increase the consumption of prey or basal resources in areas with engineered structures (Crutsinger & Sanders, ). However, these studies have generally not explicitly examined the spatial patterns of consumption around engineered structures (but see Feichtinger & Reavey, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%