2004
DOI: 10.1002/crat.200410272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of heat transfer for the modified markov method

Abstract: In this work, we present a theoretical analysis of the behaviour of the temperature profile for the Modified Markov Method. We have assumed different materials and different thicknesses for the insulating element.Comparison of preliminary results with experimental evidences, demonstrate us the reliability of our model. Discussion among our calculated results are provided and future outlooks for the experimental work are fixed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the numerical simulated gradient temperatures are higher than the experimental ones. This difference may be due to the temperature profile assumed for the radiative element [13]. In addition, there is a lower deviation of the experimental results from the theoretical ones for the C configuration.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the numerical simulated gradient temperatures are higher than the experimental ones. This difference may be due to the temperature profile assumed for the radiative element [13]. In addition, there is a lower deviation of the experimental results from the theoretical ones for the C configuration.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The experimental measurement agrees with the theoretical prediction, and the lower gradient temperature was obtained in the experience C. But in the case of the numerical simulation the gradient temperature are higher than the experimental values. We think that this difference should be due to the temperature profile assumed for the radiative element [13]. In addition, the deviation of the experimental results compared than the theoretical are lower in the experience C. This fact should be explained if we consider that the inclusion of the alumina insulating element is a buffer between the radiative element and the growth chamber [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations