2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11043-018-9390-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and clinical investigation on the material model of the cornea in Corvis tonometry tests: differentiation between hyperelasticity and viscoelasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings of our work may impact the results of various clinical studies that have utilized uncorrected air puff load values to monitor KCN ( Tian et al, 2014 ; Elham et al, 2017 ), evaluate corneal crosslinking ( Bak-Nielsen et al, 2014 ; Tian et al, 2014 ), assess the risk of refractive surgery ( Kataria et al, 2019 ), assess corneal response pre/post refractive surgery ( Pedersen et al, 2014 ; Frings et al, 2015 ; Sefat et al, 2016 ; Xu et al, 2017 ), or compare different methods of refractive surgery ( Pedersen et al, 2014 ; Sefat et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, the significant change in the air puff load as a response to the deformed corneal surface is neglected in many modeling studies of noncontact corneal deformation ( Francis et al, 2019 ; Jannesari et al, 2019 ). Although a previous modeling study reported changes in the fluid dynamics characteristics as the cornea deformed, the specifics of these changes were not quantified ( Kling et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings of our work may impact the results of various clinical studies that have utilized uncorrected air puff load values to monitor KCN ( Tian et al, 2014 ; Elham et al, 2017 ), evaluate corneal crosslinking ( Bak-Nielsen et al, 2014 ; Tian et al, 2014 ), assess the risk of refractive surgery ( Kataria et al, 2019 ), assess corneal response pre/post refractive surgery ( Pedersen et al, 2014 ; Frings et al, 2015 ; Sefat et al, 2016 ; Xu et al, 2017 ), or compare different methods of refractive surgery ( Pedersen et al, 2014 ; Sefat et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, the significant change in the air puff load as a response to the deformed corneal surface is neglected in many modeling studies of noncontact corneal deformation ( Francis et al, 2019 ; Jannesari et al, 2019 ). Although a previous modeling study reported changes in the fluid dynamics characteristics as the cornea deformed, the specifics of these changes were not quantified ( Kling et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To present a quantitative comparison, a set of dynamic corneal deformation parameters was selected from Corvis-ST analysis of patient data, namely: peak distance (PD), radius of curvature at highest concavity (HCR), and maximum apical displacement (MAD). Following the study by Jannesari et al [17], the retraction of the eyeball was calculated, and the pure corneal clinical deformation responses along with corresponding values from the developed a FEM for each surgical scenario were obtained, as listed in Table 3. In addition, keratometry values were generated for each surgical scenario to obtain a correlation of the corneal deformation behavior along with the shape regularization effect.…”
Section: Effect Of Icrs On Corneal Deformations and Shape Regularization (Fem Validation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among numerical studies on biomechanical behavior of the cornea subjected to air-puff test [13,14], Francis et al [15] reported a better biomechanical outcome after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileuses (LASIK) than after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), while SMILE left the residual cornea biomechanically stiffer than LASIK. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the corneal material properties considering NCT, based on mechanical finite-element analysis (FEA) [13,[16][17][18] and uid-solid interactions modeling [19,20]. Muench et al [21] investigated shear stress profiles on the cornea exposed to air-puff test using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was also proposed for the material properties of the cornea. Jannesari et al state that the contribution of material viscosity in the dynamic tonometry test is trivial and can be ignored, but hyper–viscoelastic is a more accurate definition of the behavior of the whole eye globe [ 17 ]. The viscoelastic–hyperelastic model of the cornea is examined in papers [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%