Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 2006
DOI: 10.1201/noe0415415866.ch207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and physical modeling of granular flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometric, 10.1680/jgeot.18.p.260 kinematic, anddynamic similarities formulated between the scale model and the prototype scenario, are shown in Table 1 (Garnier et al, 2007). For the case of granular flows in the centrifuge, flow velocity is considered a non-scalable variable (Vallejo et al, 2006;Bowman et al, 2012;Bryant et al, 2015), implying that velocities observed in the scale model are equal to those that would be observed in a prototype N times larger. However, this reasoning becomes problematic when a prediction of flow velocity is needed prior to the experiment and during the definition of the model-scaling factor.…”
Section: Centrifugal Acceleration Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geometric, 10.1680/jgeot.18.p.260 kinematic, anddynamic similarities formulated between the scale model and the prototype scenario, are shown in Table 1 (Garnier et al, 2007). For the case of granular flows in the centrifuge, flow velocity is considered a non-scalable variable (Vallejo et al, 2006;Bowman et al, 2012;Bryant et al, 2015), implying that velocities observed in the scale model are equal to those that would be observed in a prototype N times larger. However, this reasoning becomes problematic when a prediction of flow velocity is needed prior to the experiment and during the definition of the model-scaling factor.…”
Section: Centrifugal Acceleration Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of a well-established set of scaling principles for static and dynamic systems, the scaling principles formulated for kinematic processes are still under validation. Exploratory studies in this direction have been conducted in the past by Vallejo et al (2006), Brucks et al (2007), Gue (2012), Bowman et al (2012), Ng et al (2017), and Cabrera & Wu (2017a). All have faced challenges from a technological point of view (i.e., material mixing, triggering mechanism, feeding system, channel instrumentation), and theoretical complications arising from estimating the extent to which the curvature of the centrifugal acceleration field, and the non-inertial reference frame, affect the resultant mass flows and their relation with prototype events (Bryant et al, 2015;Cabrera & Wu,2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gravity-driven mass flows, the influence of gravity is being increasingly studied by means of an augmented centrifugal acceleration field (Arndt et al, 2006;Bowman et al, 2010;Dorbolo et al, 2013;Gue et al, 2010;Imre et al, 2010;Mathews, 2013;Vallejo et al, 2006). However, the orientation of the model relative to the centrifugal acceleration field has strong effects on the resultant flow dynamics as presented in Bryant et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, the technique has been used to simulate the conditions prevalent in geophysical granular mass movements such as landslides and debris flows [e.g. [2][3][4]. In contrast to traditional laboratory-scale studies of large granular mass movements, which usually rely on Froude scaling for initial flow conditions [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%