2020
DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-19-0356.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Mountain Waves over the Southern Andes. Part I: Mountain Wave and Secondary Wave Character, Evolutions, and Breaking

Abstract: This paper addresses the compressible nonlinear dynamics accompanying increasing mountain wave (MW) forcing over the southern Andes and propagation into the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) under winter conditions. A stretched grid provides very high resolution of the MW dynamics in a large computational domain. A slow increase of cross-mountain winds enables MWs to initially break in the mesosphere and extend to lower and higher altitudes thereafter. MW structure and breaking is strongly modulated by s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
79
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
9
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is clear that the wave activity in the MLT region over the Patagonian sector is very strong. This is also consistent with previous studies based on satellite measurements (e.g., Ern et al, 2011), and numerical simulations (e.g., Lund et al, 2020).…”
Section: Gravity-wave-driven Momentum Fluxsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, it is clear that the wave activity in the MLT region over the Patagonian sector is very strong. This is also consistent with previous studies based on satellite measurements (e.g., Ern et al, 2011), and numerical simulations (e.g., Lund et al, 2020).…”
Section: Gravity-wave-driven Momentum Fluxsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The resulting scheme is globally conservative for mass, momentum, total energy, and kinetic energy. Time advancement is achieved via a low-storage, third-order accurate Runge-Kutta scheme with a fixed time step of  Δ 0.8 t s. Additional details for CGCAM are provided by Dong et al (2020) and Lund et al (2020).…”
Section: Cgcam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucially, these 2GWs (and higher order) appear to consist of concentric rings in modelling and observational studies (Kogure et al, 2020;Lund et al, 2020;Fritts et al, 2021) that radiate in all directions, except for the direction exactly perpendicular to the original breaking GW. This could explain why we do not see a strong zonal tendency for GW variance during winter above 85 km, as the GW directions are more evenly distributed in azimuth.…”
Section: Gw Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South Georgia is located near to the global GW "hot spot" of activity in the stratosphere of the southern Andes and Antarctic Peninsula (Hindley et al, 2015;Hoffmann et al, 2013;Hindley et al, 2020), and is also an intense source of wintertime GW activity itself (Hoffmann et al, 2014;Hindley et al, 2021). Further, recent observations and modelling have indicated significant generation and propagation of 2GWs in the mesosphere and thermosphere in the region (Becker and Vadas, 2018;Kogure et al, 2020;Lund et al, 2020;Fritts et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%