2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.taml.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of unsteady flows over a slow-flying bat

Abstract: This letter describes numerical simulation of the unsteady flow over a slow-flying bat by using the immersed boundary method based on the measured bat wing geometry and kinematics. The main vortical structures around the bat flapping wings are identified, illuminating the lift-generating role of the leading-edge vortices generated mainly in the downstroke. Furthermore, the lift decomposition indicates that the vortex lift has the dominant contribution to the time-averaged lift and the lift associated with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lift coefficient remains positive during the transition stage from the downstroke to the upstroke, which is attributed to the positive vortex lift in the upstroke (see §5). The time history of the lift coefficient for the Pallas' longtongued bat is similar to that reported by Wang et al [43] for a model of the grey-headed flying fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) with different wing morphology at a higher Reynolds number (1000). However, there are some differences in the detailed histories of the lift coefficient between the two kinds of bats, which might be associated with the different wing geometry.…”
Section: Flow Structures and Lift Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The lift coefficient remains positive during the transition stage from the downstroke to the upstroke, which is attributed to the positive vortex lift in the upstroke (see §5). The time history of the lift coefficient for the Pallas' longtongued bat is similar to that reported by Wang et al [43] for a model of the grey-headed flying fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) with different wing morphology at a higher Reynolds number (1000). However, there are some differences in the detailed histories of the lift coefficient between the two kinds of bats, which might be associated with the different wing geometry.…”
Section: Flow Structures and Lift Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, these studies cannot segregate the respective role of particular structural elements of the membrane/wing composition or that of flight kinematics in the bat’s performance. Similarly, previous numerical simulations rely either on marker measurements, fixed and discrete by definition, and one-way fluid–structure interaction coupling [12,21], or on overly simplistic kinematics and constitutive laws for membrane skin [22,23]. In the first case, these numerical studies inherit the experimental study’s fixed set of parameters by design, thus preventing any further wider parametric studies, and in the second case, the respective influence of the microstructural constitutive parameters and motions of the wing membrane, and their interplay, are not captured because of the low fidelity of the kinematics and material law used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though their decomposition of wing kinematics was based on a single wing, the overall strategy showed excellent potential to identify important kinematics in designing flapping wing MAVs based on bat flight data. In 2015, Wang et al [48,49] used the immersed boundary method to simulate a slow flying bat at an intermediate Reynolds number (Re = 1000). The wing kinematic data for their simulations—borrowed from Wolf et al [50]—consisted of only five markers points per wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%