2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of propagation, bifurcation and coalescence of cracks in rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22shows no cracks initiation from the tips of the flaws 1 -6 . The reason is the stress shielding and amplification effects due to the interaction of the flawsZhou et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22shows no cracks initiation from the tips of the flaws 1 -6 . The reason is the stress shielding and amplification effects due to the interaction of the flawsZhou et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of soil fragmentation under explosive loads was simulated using a PD/SPH coupling approach in [75,76]. Moreover, the PD theory has been implemented to investigate crack behavior in rock materials [193,194,245].…”
Section: Geomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, they coalesce with the preexisting flaw ① and flaw ②, and the final failure of the rock specimen occurs, as shown in Figure (1.E). In addition, no cracks are initiated from the upper tips of flaw ① and flaw ② due to the shielding effect between the cross‐flaws …”
Section: Cracking Patterns In Rock With An Interlayermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, no cracks are initiated from the upper tips of flaw ① and flaw ② due to the shielding effect between the cross-flaws. 62 Figure 10(2) shows the crack initiation and propagation process in specimen C2-3 with a cross-flaw. It is found from Figure 10 that, the new cracks initiated from the lower tip of flaw ② and the upper tip of flaw ① propagate towards the left and right edges of the specimen, respectively, until the complete failure of the rock specimen occurs, as shown in Figure 10(2.B) and (2.C).…”
Section: Cross-flaw In the Interlayer With Different Mechanical Promentioning
confidence: 99%