2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of nonlinear two-dimensional integral equations using rationalized Haar functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 10, we compare the maximum absolute error and measured CPU time(s) for each of the present method, block-pulse functions method [45] and rationalized Haar functions method [44]. This fact is obvious from Table 10 that the results obtained by the present method is better than that obtained in [44] and [45]. f (x, y) = x + y − 1 12…”
Section: Example 4 Consider the Following Two-dimensional Nonlinear Fmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In Table 10, we compare the maximum absolute error and measured CPU time(s) for each of the present method, block-pulse functions method [45] and rationalized Haar functions method [44]. This fact is obvious from Table 10 that the results obtained by the present method is better than that obtained in [44] and [45]. f (x, y) = x + y − 1 12…”
Section: Example 4 Consider the Following Two-dimensional Nonlinear Fmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…where the coefficients {c 1 , … , c N } are determined by solving the nonlinear system that is obtained by replacing the expansion (21) with u(x, t) and pick distinct the node points in the integral equation (20). The iteration methods, such as Newton's method for solving these types of cumbersome nonlinear systems, require to compute several definite integrals at each step of the iteration, and so they are usually sensitive to the selection of initial guess.…”
Section: Solution Of Integral Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in recent years, several numerical approaches have been proposed. For instance, a reduced differential transform method, a method using radial basis functions, a numerical method based on Haar wavelet, 2‐dimensional orthogonal triangular functions, and the 2‐dimensional rationalized Haar can be used to approximate the solution, in approximation method based on a polynomial system . There are furthermore a spectral meshless radial point interpolation method, a method based on developing the 2‐dimensional differential transform, a discrete Galerkin and iterated Galerkin method, an integral mean‐value method, a piecewise interpolating polynomial technique (a 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐dimensional modification of the hat functions method, respectively), a 2‐dimensional triangular orthogonal functions method, a numerical scheme based on the moving least squares method, an operational matrix and 2‐dimensional block pulse functions methods, a method using Legendre polynomials, an iterative numerical method of successive approximations, and He variational method …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%