2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2012.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical studies on density jump in a long corridor fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4d that density jump occurred. Vortices for CFD simulations from Qu and Chow (2012) as in Fig. 2c did not appear.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4d that density jump occurred. Vortices for CFD simulations from Qu and Chow (2012) as in Fig. 2c did not appear.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, two-dimensional simulations were carried out first. According to the description by Regev et al (2004), and referring to the model used by Qu and Chow (2012), the long corridor was of length 20 m and height 9 m with the computing domain extended out to better describe the free boundary, and with a hot smoke jet inflow and two ends open. The smoke barrier height was 0.5 m. In this set of scenarios, a hot smoke jet with velocity V in of 5 m/s and depth D 1 of 0.1 m and temperature 300°C is flowing from the smoke jet inflow, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the accuracy is limited under many circumstances. Although there are many problems in using computational fluid dynamics CFD, it can be applied to predict macroscopic flow parameters (Qu and Chow, 2012). By using CFD, research has been conducted on the density jump (Qu and Chow, 2012), smoke control (Weng et al, 2014), critical ventilation velocity (Hwang and Edwards, 2015), stack effects on natural ventilation (Ji et al, 2013), and slope influence (Ballesteros-Tajadura et al, 2006) in a tunnel fire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%