41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-3078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of Freestream Hot-Spot Perturbation on Boundary-Layer Receptivity for Blunt Compression-Cones in Mach-6 Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of the smooth compression cone at the current freestream condition by Wheaton et al [22], no transition was observed, and the maximum N factor obtained from linear stability equation (LST) reached 14 at the end of the cone. In addition, Huang and Zhong [23,[25][26][27][28] have conducted extensive numerical and stability studies of boundary-layer receptivity to freestream hotspot perturbations with the same freestream conditions over a compression cone.…”
Section: A Test Model and Flow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of the smooth compression cone at the current freestream condition by Wheaton et al [22], no transition was observed, and the maximum N factor obtained from linear stability equation (LST) reached 14 at the end of the cone. In addition, Huang and Zhong [23,[25][26][27][28] have conducted extensive numerical and stability studies of boundary-layer receptivity to freestream hotspot perturbations with the same freestream conditions over a compression cone.…”
Section: A Test Model and Flow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past computational and theoretical receptivity studies have included investigations of acoustic waves, 5-7 of vorticity waves, 8 of discrete particles, 9 and of small entropic disturbances. [10][11][12][13][14] However, receptivity experiments are difficult to perform, making it challenging to validate the computational and theoretical studies. Experimental studies have largely been in the subsonic regime, and the few existing high-speed studies typically use disturbances that are not easily characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the receptivity of supersonic boundary layer to freestream entropy waves is essentially similar to the receptivity to freestream fast acoustic waves; the fast acoustic waves generated behind the shock and propagate downstream into the boundary layer, and excite the instability modes in it. Ma & Zhong has compared their simulation results with McKenzie et al's theoretical results, and have good agreement.Huang & Zhong [38,39] completed the numerical study of the boundary-layer receptivity mechanism over a blunt compression cone with an entropy spot in Mach-6 freestream. They found that the receptivity mechanism to entropy perturbations is essentially the same as the freestream receptivity to fast acoustic waves, which is consistent to Ma & Zhong's finding [16].This paper is an extension to the study of the receptivity to an entropy spot in Huang & Zhong [38,39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma & Zhong has compared their simulation results with McKenzie et al's theoretical results, and have good agreement.Huang & Zhong [38,39] completed the numerical study of the boundary-layer receptivity mechanism over a blunt compression cone with an entropy spot in Mach-6 freestream. They found that the receptivity mechanism to entropy perturbations is essentially the same as the freestream receptivity to fast acoustic waves, which is consistent to Ma & Zhong's finding [16].This paper is an extension to the study of the receptivity to an entropy spot in Huang & Zhong [38,39]. The study has been extended from the receptivity mechanism of a single case to comparisons of mechanisms between different cases with controlled variation in freestream Mach number and nose bluntness.In the current study, there are two cases under nose bluntness effects and two cases under freestream Mach number effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation