2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27146-6_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of SPIF Process of Al–Cu Bimetal Sheet Using Finite Element Analysis: Influence of Process Parameters on the Mechanical and Geometrical Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the inclination angle of the cone product has a vital influence on the sheet material behaviour, which is characterised by the percentage of thinning, and the obtained findings of this response is roughly at 45° twice times bigger compared with the 65° wall angle. The results observed in both sheet metals used in this investigation agree with findings in [20,27,28]. Secondly, the behaviour of thickness distribution is non-homogenous and irregular along with the wall profile, which is one of the drawbacks of the SPIF process.…”
Section: Wall Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the inclination angle of the cone product has a vital influence on the sheet material behaviour, which is characterised by the percentage of thinning, and the obtained findings of this response is roughly at 45° twice times bigger compared with the 65° wall angle. The results observed in both sheet metals used in this investigation agree with findings in [20,27,28]. Secondly, the behaviour of thickness distribution is non-homogenous and irregular along with the wall profile, which is one of the drawbacks of the SPIF process.…”
Section: Wall Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Arfa et al [28] inferred that the thickness greatly decreased with the increase in the wall angle of the truncated cone. The results showed that the final thickness in the wall profile significantly decreased from 1.2 mm (initial thickness) to 0.649, 0.524 and 0.440 mm for the 55°, 60° and 65° wall angle, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%