2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-03907-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of the triggering mechanism of the 2018 Anak Krakatau tsunami: eruption or collapsed landslide?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our new volume calculation is close to the lowest end of this volume range, similar to the authors' revised model. The landslide volume presented here is also supported by tsunami modelling estimates in other studies [24][25][26][27][34][35][36][37] ; thus, indicating that our mapped landslide volume can explain the recorded tsunami without the need to invoke any additional source mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our new volume calculation is close to the lowest end of this volume range, similar to the authors' revised model. The landslide volume presented here is also supported by tsunami modelling estimates in other studies [24][25][26][27][34][35][36][37] ; thus, indicating that our mapped landslide volume can explain the recorded tsunami without the need to invoke any additional source mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In many respects, the Anak Krakatau edifice is comparable to Ritter, being dominated by well-bedded mafic volcaniclastic deposits with interbedded lavas. At Ritter, however, this clastic failure mass appears to have been relatively weak and disintegrated rapidly, forming a highly mobile flow 35 , 45 . Although a superficially similar edifice, the pattern of disintegration at Anak Krakatau is in strong contrast to Ritter, suggesting that the bulk properties, fragmentation and pre-collapse pattern of deformation preconditioning failure, may not be easily predictable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical modeling of the event by Paris et al (2020) and Zengaffinen et al (2020) further reconfirmed the source model initially proposed by Heidarzadeh et al (2020a). The volume of the sliding mass during the AKT was estimated at 0.2-0.3 km 3 by Ren et al (2020) whereas Heidarzadeh et al (2020a) reported it in the range of 0.175-0.326 km 3 . The volume estimate by Grilli et al (2019) is 0.22-0.30 km 3 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Wang et al (2020) designed offshore bottom pressure gauges (OBPGs) network using the results simulated by a two-layer model. Moreover, Ren et al (2020) simulated the landslide tsunami induced by the collapse of Anak Krakatau in 2018. This model (Imamura and Imteaz 1995) was used in the present study to simulate the Palu tsunami and to investigate the landslide locations based on the observed run-up heights and video footages which were not considered by Pakoksung et al (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%