2000
DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.11.1586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional evaluation of low phytate and high protein corns

Abstract: Three chick experiments and two cecectomized rooster experiments were conducted to determine P bioavailability and amino acid (AA) digestibility in two low phytate corns (LP), a high protein corn (HP), and a corn containing both low phytate and high protein content (HP/LP) compared with conventional corn (CONV). From 8 to 20 or 21 d of age, 1-wk-old New Hampshire x Columbian chicks were fed a cornstarch-dextrose-soybean meal (SBM) basal diet containing 0.10% available P or the basal diet supplemented with two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In broiler experiments conducted with normal or low-phytate corn and corn byproducts, positive improvements in growth performance have also been noted (Douglas et al 2000;Peter and Baker 2002). Adding the test ingredients increased the concentrations of NPP as well as amino acids in the test diets compared to that of the basal and reference diets.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Tibia Biomechanical Properties And Asmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In broiler experiments conducted with normal or low-phytate corn and corn byproducts, positive improvements in growth performance have also been noted (Douglas et al 2000;Peter and Baker 2002). Adding the test ingredients increased the concentrations of NPP as well as amino acids in the test diets compared to that of the basal and reference diets.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Tibia Biomechanical Properties And Asmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2001, 2002). However, to date these studies have only compared two lines of a given crop, one normal line and one low phytate line, and the level of reduction in seed phytic acid in the low phytate line has, with one exception (Douglas et al . 2000), ranged from 50 to 66%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TAADs of LPM were not different from those of NM in the current study, suggesting that reducing the phytate in maize did not improve the AA digestibility in ducks. With the precision-fed rooster assay, Douglas et al (2000) found that the digestibility of AAs in LPM were at least equal to and possibly greater than those in NM, because the TAADs in LPM were higher than those in NM for 8 AAs and do not significantly differ for the others. Most of the TAADs for LPSBM in experiment 2 were observed to be higher than those of NSBM, except those for histidine, cysteine and tyrosine that were not different indicating that, for ducks, the available AAs in LPSBM are higher than those in NSBM.…”
Section: Value Of Ingredients For Ducksmentioning
confidence: 93%