2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2014.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nylon 6 film and nanofiber carriers: Preparation and laccase immobilization performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing the PCL nanofiber membrane, the characteristic bands were found at 2949 cm −1 , referring to the asymmetric CH 2 stretch; at 2867 cm −1 , referring to the symmetrical CH 2 vibrational stretch; at 1725 cm −1 , corresponding to the C=O bond; at 1297 cm −1 , the COC–C stretch obtained in the crystalline phase; at 1240 cm −1 , the COC asymmetric stretch and at 1173 cm −1 , corresponding to the symmetric COC stretch [Figure (a)] . Analyzing the PA‐6 nanofiber membrane [Figure (b)], characteristic peaks of PAs due to peptide bonding were observed at 3300 cm −1 (ν of the NH group), 1650 cm −1 (ν of CO–amide I group), 1550 cm −1 (δ of the NH group + ν of CN–amide II), 2857 cm −1 (symmetric CH 2 vibrational stretch), and 2930 cm −1 (nonsymmetric CH 2 vibrational stretch), according to different publications . In addition, a band in the ν region of the –OH group (3450 cm −1 ) of water was due to the hydrophilicity of the nanofiber membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing the PCL nanofiber membrane, the characteristic bands were found at 2949 cm −1 , referring to the asymmetric CH 2 stretch; at 2867 cm −1 , referring to the symmetrical CH 2 vibrational stretch; at 1725 cm −1 , corresponding to the C=O bond; at 1297 cm −1 , the COC–C stretch obtained in the crystalline phase; at 1240 cm −1 , the COC asymmetric stretch and at 1173 cm −1 , corresponding to the symmetric COC stretch [Figure (a)] . Analyzing the PA‐6 nanofiber membrane [Figure (b)], characteristic peaks of PAs due to peptide bonding were observed at 3300 cm −1 (ν of the NH group), 1650 cm −1 (ν of CO–amide I group), 1550 cm −1 (δ of the NH group + ν of CN–amide II), 2857 cm −1 (symmetric CH 2 vibrational stretch), and 2930 cm −1 (nonsymmetric CH 2 vibrational stretch), according to different publications . In addition, a band in the ν region of the –OH group (3450 cm −1 ) of water was due to the hydrophilicity of the nanofiber membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microenvironment of the immobilized enzyme and bulk solution usually has unequal partitioning of H + and OH − concentrations due to electrostatic interactions with the matrix, which often leads to the displacements in the pH activity profile [25,27]. Furthermore, pH profiles of the immobilized laccase are broader than free enzyme, which means that the immobilization method preserved enzyme activity in a wider pH range [31,32]. These results could probably be attributed to the stabilization of laccase resulting from its multipoint attachments on the surface of poly(GMAco-nBA) microspheres.…”
Section: Effect Of Glutaric Dialdehyde As Cross-linking Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar increasing behaviour of the KMvalue with cellulose nanofibre was reported by Sathishkumar et al, while KM,0 = 0.343 mM was also three times higher than the value of free laccase. Much higher values were obtained for nylon nanofibre (1.07 mM) and nylon film (1.59 mM) by Fatarella et al The maximum value of 4.7 Mm was found for Amberlit IR‐120H by Spinelli et al, which was a result of the diffusion limitation of the substrate due to interactions between the substrate and the support, or due to the conformational change of the enzyme with lower possibility to form the substrate‐enzyme complex …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, the porous loofa carrier material provides a large surface area, which enables a large number of laccase molecules to immobilize in close proximity covering the entire surface and preventing the enzyme deactivation. Fatarella et al also found that the physical properties of the carrier (e.g. shape, surface area, and pore diameter) influence the enzyme binding as well as the activity, reusability, and even stability of the immobilized enzyme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%