O efeito do treinamento pliométrico no desempenho do salto vertical em atletas jovens de basquete

Correia, Gustavo; Júnior, Carlos Gilberto de Freitas; Lira, Hugo Augusto Alvares da Silva; Oliveira, Saulo Fernandes Melo de; Santos, Wlaldemir Roberto dos; Silva, Camilla Karen de Farias Bezerra da; Silva, Paulo Henrique Vaz da; Paes, Pedro Pinheiro

doi:10.4025/jphyseduc.v31i1.3175

Cited by 10 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is a medical imaging technique used to assess body composition, particularly bone mineral density (BMD), lean mass, and fat mass. The scan provides 2013 [14] 2014 [15,16] 2015 [17,18] 2016 [19] 2017 [20,21] 2018 [22,23] 2019 [24,25,26] 2020 [27,28] 2021 [29,30,31] 2022 [32,33,34,35,36] 2023 [37,38,39] Sample Size Range…”

Section: Bone Mineral Densitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Plyometric* [14-20, 23-30, 32, 34-38] 22 Plyometric* + Isometric [21] Plyometric* + Strength + Change of Direction [31] Plyometric* + Whole-body Vibration [33] High Intensity [39] Intervention Trial Type Single Arm Clinical Trial [14,37] Parallel Group Clinical Trial [20] Randomized Controlled Trial [15-19, 21-32, 34-36, 39] 22 Randomized Crossover Trial [33] Intervention Training Period 4 Weeks [17,24,27,29,30] 6 Weeks [14,15,18,19,28,32,34,36] 7 Weeks [23,31] 8 Weeks [37,39] 9 Weeks [16] 10 Weeks [21,26] 12 Weeks [25,35,38] 36 Weeks [20] Period not specified [33] Intervention Training Frequency 2 days per Week [15-19, 21-24, 26, 27, 29, 31] 13 3 days per Week [28,30,32,34,36,37,38,39] 5 days per Week [14,25,35] Frequen...…”

Section: Intervention Training Typementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Male [14, 16-18, 20-27, 30-33, 35, 36, 37, 38] 20 Female [15,19] Male and Female [28,29,34,37] Note: *Plyometric with regular basketball training. Примечание: *Плиометрия при регулярных тренировках по баскетболу.…”

Section: Gendermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Mostly all the studies employed a hypothesis testing statistical significance level p-value (probability value) of p < 0.01 [8,33] (or) p < 0.05 [14, 16, 18-21, 27, 30, 32, 33, 35-38] (or) p ≤ 0.05 [15, 17, 22-26, 29, 31, 34], with a confidence interval set at either 90 % (or) 95 %. Different statistical analysis tools like Statistica v8.0 and v10.0 [14,16,23], SPSS version varying from v10.0 to v25.0 [15,18,19,21,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], and BioEstat v5.0 [20] were used for these analyses.…”

Section: E Statistical Analysis Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review: Significance of Plyometric Training on Functional Performance and Bone Mineral Density in Basketball Players of Different Age Groups

Anversha,

Ramalingam

2023

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Basketball necessitates a holistic approach to player development, encompassing both skill and physicality, with a critical emphasis on understanding these requirements due to its complex tactics. Plyometric training’s potential in sport performance lacks comprehensive research. This systematic review, guided by PRISMA guidelines, aims to analyse diverse range of literature concerning healthy athletes, investigating its significance on functional performance and bone mineral density in basketball players of different age groups (pre-teen, adolescent, and young adult).Methods: The study conducted electronic searches in databases like PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ResearchGate, supplemented with manual reference searches, covering the period from 2013 to June 2023. Initially, 783 items were identified. Inclusion criteria involved English-language publications focusing on basketball players aged 8 to 28 years, assessing plyometric training’s effect on functional performance with quantitative measurements. Screening began with titles and abstracts, followed by full-text evaluation to ensure eligibility.Results: A database search yielded 26 peer-reviewed articles, primarily randomized controlled trials, showing significant functional improvements through plyometric training (4-36 weeks, 2-3 times weekly). Assessments covered explosive leg power, agility, sprinting, muscle strength, and bone density. Male participants dominated, but female and mixed-gender groups were included. Results consistently highlighted plyometric training’s positive impact with statistical significance.Conclusion: This review provides evidence that plyometric training improves agility, sprinting ability, leg power, basketball skills as well as BMD across different age groups of players. It establishes plyometrics as effective for boosting on-court performance. Integrating plyometric training holds great promise in advancing athlete success in basketball.

show abstract

Section: Bone Mineral Densitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intervention Training Typementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gendermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: E Statistical Analysis Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review: Significance of Plyometric Training on Functional Performance and Bone Mineral Density in Basketball Players of Different Age Groups

Anversha,

Ramalingam

2023

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Varios estudios han evaluado las relaciones entre la potencia muscular a través del salto vertical versus pruebas de campo (Correia et al, 2020), algunos de ellos frente a test comúnmente utilizados para evaluar atributos relacionados con la PM en el baloncesto, Paulauskas et al (2018) y otros han utilizado sobrecargas, inclusive en varios deportes (San Román et al, 2011;Bevan et al, 2010;Naclerio et al, 2009). En general se han reportado relaciones significativas entre la potencia media y acciones técnicas especificas como lanzamientos y saltos (Khlifa et al, 2010;Miura et al, 2010;Naclerio et al, 2004), como también relaciones significativas entre la potencia máxima con la altura del salto y aceleraciones (Balsalobre et al, 2012;Naclerio et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Relación entre potencia muscular, rendimiento físico y competitivo en jugadores de baloncesto

García-Chaves

Corredor-Serrano

Arboleda

2020

Retos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La potencia muscular (PM) es relevante en el baloncesto, aunque no es clara su relación con el rendimiento físico y competitivo, cuando se manifiesta a diferentes cargas. Objetivo: analizar la relación entre la PM a varias cargas con el rendimiento físico y competitivo en baloncestistas. En 20 jugadores (edad 18.2 ± 5.1 años, peso 80.1 ± 13.7 kg, talla 185.6 ± 4.4 cm) se midió la fuerza máxima a través de 1RM y PM de 40% a 80% de 1RM en sentadilla media; carrera en 20 m lanzados, salto largo, test de Illinois con y sin balón y estadística de juego con Valoración Final (VAL). Se halló la mayor PM entre 70% y 80% de 1RM; La prueba Illinois con balón correlacionó con la PM en todas las cargas (p<.05) y la carrera en 20 m con potencia media entre 50% y 80% de 1RM. El VAL del torneo correlacionó con cargas medias y bajas en intentos de tiros de larga distancia (rho = .79; p<.01), convertidos (rho = .68; p<.05) y porcentaje de tiros de campo (rho = .70; p<.05). En el partido final varios tipos de tiros correlacionaron inversamente con cargas altas. Conclusión: hay relación entre PM, rendimiento físico y competitivo según la carga y debe considerarse para su entrenamiento en el baloncesto. Abstract. Muscle power (MP) is relevant in basketball, although its relationship with physical and competitive performance is not clear when it manifests itself at different overloads. Objective: to analyze the relationship between MP at various loads with physical and competitive performance in basketball players. In 20 players (age 18.2 ± 5.1 years, weight 80.1 ± 13.7 kg, height 185.6 ± 4.4 cm) maximum strength was measured through 1RM and PM from 40% to 80% of 1RM in the middle squat; 20 meters sprint launched, long jump, Illinois test with and without the ball and game statistics with Final Valuation (VAL). The highest MP was found between 70% and 80% of 1RM; The Illinois test with ball correlated with the MP in all loads (p <.05) and 20 meters sprint launched with medium power between 50% and 80% of 1RM. The tournament VAL correlated with medium and low loads in long-distance shot attempts (rho = .79; p<.01), converted (rho = .68; p<.05) and percentage of field goals (rho = .70; p<.05). In the final game various types of shots inversely correlated with high loads. Conclusion: there is a relationship between MP, physical and competitive performance according to the load and it should be considered for its training in basketball.

show abstract

Changes in Counter Movement Jump Height, Take-off Force and Maximum Concentric Power of Collegiate Athletes After Two Sessions Per Week Plyometric Training on Different Training Surfaces

Borah

Gogoi

et al. 2023

СНСВ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effects of two sessions per week plyometric training on different surfaces on the counter movement jump height, take-off force, and maximum concentric power of collegiate athletes. Material and methods: Male collegiate athletes (n=24, age=18.46±1.14 years, weight=64.88±5.61 kg and height=1.72±0.07 metres)) from a physical training centre were randomly and equally assigned to three groups, each trained on different surfaces (synthetic, cinder and sand). The training intervention was implemented twice a week and lasted for 8 weeks. The athletes were tested before and after the intervention to assess changes in the performance of counter movement jump height (CMJHT), take-off force (CMJTOF) and maximum concentric power (CMJMCP). Results: Results showed that overall measurement of CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ %=10.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.11; p≤0.05, Δ%=11.41). However, training surfaces have no significant effect on the improvement of the selected variables (CMJHT:F(2,21)=2.37, p=0.118, ηp2=0.184; CMJTOF:F(2,21)=1.28, p=0.299, ηp2=0.109; CMJMCP:F(2,21)=0.061, p=0.941, ηp2=0.006). Further, for the synthetic track surface group CMJHT, CMJTOF and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=16.36; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.50; p≤0.05, Δ%=17.99); for the cinder track surface group CMJHT and CMJMCP improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=9.15; p≤0.05, Δ%=10.33) and for the sand surface group only CMJHT improved significantly (p≤0.05, Δ%=5.68). Conclusions: The findings suggest that plyometric training on different surfaces can effectively improve athletic performance, but the specific surface type does not appear to impact the outcomes significantly. The study further suggested analysing the injury risk associated with plyometric training on various training surfaces and discovering the optimal training surface for minimising injury risk while maximising performance gains.

show abstract

O efeito do treinamento pliométrico no desempenho do salto vertical em atletas jovens de basquete

Cited by 10 publications

References 21 publications

A Systematic Review: Significance of Plyometric Training on Functional Performance and Bone Mineral Density in Basketball Players of Different Age Groups

A Systematic Review: Significance of Plyometric Training on Functional Performance and Bone Mineral Density in Basketball Players of Different Age Groups

Relación entre potencia muscular, rendimiento físico y competitivo en jugadores de baloncesto

Changes in Counter Movement Jump Height, Take-off Force and Maximum Concentric Power of Collegiate Athletes After Two Sessions Per Week Plyometric Training on Different Training Surfaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About