O Papel Do Fundo Nacional De Desenvolvimento Científico E Tecnológico (Fndct) E Dos Fundos Setoriais No Crescimento Da Produção De Conhecimento No Brasil

Santos, Catarina de Almeida; Moraes, Karine Nunes de; Lemos, Jandernaide Resende; Machado, Ana María

doi:10.5216/ia.v36i1.15025

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, partnerships with other federal government ministries include the MCTI through CNPq and the MEC through CAPES, as well as the National Science and Technology Funds, which contribute significantly to the development of government science and technology programs in Brazil [69]. Although the MCTI/CNPq and MEC/CAPES have contributed only 0.5% to NTD research funding, they are partner institutions that help the Ministry of Health with the administrative and financial management of research activities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of research funding for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil, 2004–2020

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neglected tropical diseases are a global public health problem. Although Brazil is largely responsible for their occurrence in Latin America, research funding on the subject does not meet the population’s health needs. The present study analyzed the evolution of research funding for neglected tropical diseases by the Ministry of Health and its partners in Brazil, from 2004 to 2020. This is a retrospective study of data from investigations registered on Health Research (Pesquisa Saúde in Portuguese), a public repository for research funded by the Ministry of Health’s Department of Science and Technology. The temporal trend of funding and the influence of federal government changes on funding were analyzed using Prais-Winster generalized linear regression. From 2004 to 2020, 1,158 studies were financed (purchasing power parity (PPP$) 230.9 million), with most funding aimed at biomedical research (81.6%) and topics involving dengue, leishmaniasis and tuberculosis (60.2%). Funding was stationary (annual percent change of -5.7%; 95%CI -54.0 to 45.0) and influenced by changes to the federal government. Research funding was lacking for chikungunya, Chagas disease, schistosomiasis, malaria and taeniasis/cysticercosis, diseases with a high prevalence, burden or mortality rates in Brazil. Although the Ministry of Health had several budgetary partners, it was the main funder, with 69.8% of investments. The study revealed that research funding for neglected tropical diseases has stagnated over the years and that diseases with a high prevalence, burden and mortality rate receive little funding. These findings demonstrate the need to strengthen the health research system by providing sustainable funding for research on neglected tropical diseases that is consistent with the population’s health needs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of research funding for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil, 2004–2020

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• Doenças negligenciadas pelas agencias financiadoras de C&T, como defendido por Kenneth Warren durante seu período como Diretor do Programa The Great Neglected Diseases of Mankind da Fundação Rockefeller; [31] [71] • Doenças negligenciadas pelas grandes companhias farmacêuticas [65];…”

Section: Doenças Tropicais Negligenciadas: Qual Definição Adotar?unclassified

Doenças negligenciadas e Políticas públicas de saúde: estamos no caminho?

SILVA,

CARNEIRO

2023

Congresso Internacional Ambiente &Amp; Sustentabilidade: Desafios E Caminhos Para O Cumprimento Dos ODS &Amp; AGENDA 2030

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Observatório de egressos(as) de pós-graduação para fomentar impactos dos resultados de pesquisas

Machado

Ennafaa²,

Lorenzini

2017

Linhas Crít.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problematizamos resultados parciais de pesquisa-observatório, com foco na distância-aproximação entre comunidade científica e mundo do trabalho. Egressos(as) da pós-graduação (PG), mestres e doutores(as) são potenciais protagonistas nessa interface. Verificamos que titulados(as) melhoram suas condições de vida, mas há pouco aproveitamento dos resultados das suas teses e dissertações no espaço de trabalho e baixa contribuição para a sociedade, caracterizando desperdício de recursos públicos. Discute-se os limites da noção de impacto da pesquisa, centrada em publicações.

show abstract

O Papel Do Fundo Nacional De Desenvolvimento Científico E Tecnológico (Fndct) E Dos Fundos Setoriais No Crescimento Da Produção De Conhecimento No Brasil

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Evolution of research funding for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil, 2004–2020

Evolution of research funding for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil, 2004–2020

Doenças negligenciadas e Políticas públicas de saúde: estamos no caminho?

Observatório de egressos(as) de pós-graduação para fomentar impactos dos resultados de pesquisas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About