1991
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(91)90285-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of very large electromagnetic dissociation cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 shows that this expectation could be verified: the soft-spheres calculation for 1n-removal from 197 Au by ED processes (upper full curve) is almost indistinguishable from a sharp-cutoff calculation using b BCV min (upper dotted curve). This remarkable agreement tells us that for practical purposes we can avoid the extra numerical complication connected with the use of a soft spheres model and corroborates the use of b BCV min in sharp-cutoff calculations in earlier works [47,48]. We also think that the soft-spheres calculation (and the sharp-cutoff calculation using b BCV min ) is physically better justified than the Kox parametrization [44] since the former is derived from realistic nuclear density distributions, whereas the latter is an extrapolation of measured total reaction cross sections into a region where no data points are available.…”
Section: Nucleon Removal In Peripheral Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…17 shows that this expectation could be verified: the soft-spheres calculation for 1n-removal from 197 Au by ED processes (upper full curve) is almost indistinguishable from a sharp-cutoff calculation using b BCV min (upper dotted curve). This remarkable agreement tells us that for practical purposes we can avoid the extra numerical complication connected with the use of a soft spheres model and corroborates the use of b BCV min in sharp-cutoff calculations in earlier works [47,48]. We also think that the soft-spheres calculation (and the sharp-cutoff calculation using b BCV min ) is physically better justified than the Kox parametrization [44] since the former is derived from realistic nuclear density distributions, whereas the latter is an extrapolation of measured total reaction cross sections into a region where no data points are available.…”
Section: Nucleon Removal In Peripheral Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…cr, "' is the experimental electromagnetic cross section from Refs. [9,11]. o ww is the cross section calculated using the WW (first-order dipole) approximation [given in Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…o'""p' is the experimental total (electromagnetic plus nuclear) cross section from Refs. [9,11]. o. x, +z2+o.…”
Section: Comparison Between Theory and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further experiments gave evidence for electromagnetic dissociation in the fragmentation of lSO projectiles at E/A = 1.7 GeV [4] and of 197Au targets excited by various projectiles [5,6]. Electromagnetic multiphonon excitations of the same targets were studied measuring the ln, 2n and 3n removal cross sections [7,8]. In other experimtents the "/-ray and neutron decay of the electromagnetically excited double giant-dipole resonance (GDR) in 2~ and 136Xe was observed [9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%