2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of two novel triazine-based flame retardants in an E-waste recycling area in South China: Implication for human exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Guiyu, for example, the daily dermal intake of gaseous BDE-47 and BDE-99 through air-mediated transfer by adults was estimated to be 0.65 ng/kg bw/day and 0.61 ng/kg bw/day, respectively, exceeding exposure via inhalation of both gaseous and particle-bound BDE-47 (0.55 ng/kg bw/day) and BDE-99 (0.33 ng/kg bw/day) (Wu et al, 2016a). Similar results were also reported by Shen et al (2019), who identified higher EDIs of NBFRs, TBBP-A, and HBCDDs through dermal absorption rather than dust ingestion for recyclers, local adults, and local children in Qingyuan, China (the same equation adopted by Abafe and Martincigh (2015) was used in this study). Moreover, there appears to date to have been no consideration of exposure via direct dermal contact with e-waste articles, which may be a significant omission given recent data demonstrating the importance of dermal exposure via direct contact with FR-treated fabrics (Abdallah and Harrad, 2018).…”
Section: Human Dermal Uptake Of Hfrs and Opfrs Arising From Informal E-waste Activitiessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Guiyu, for example, the daily dermal intake of gaseous BDE-47 and BDE-99 through air-mediated transfer by adults was estimated to be 0.65 ng/kg bw/day and 0.61 ng/kg bw/day, respectively, exceeding exposure via inhalation of both gaseous and particle-bound BDE-47 (0.55 ng/kg bw/day) and BDE-99 (0.33 ng/kg bw/day) (Wu et al, 2016a). Similar results were also reported by Shen et al (2019), who identified higher EDIs of NBFRs, TBBP-A, and HBCDDs through dermal absorption rather than dust ingestion for recyclers, local adults, and local children in Qingyuan, China (the same equation adopted by Abafe and Martincigh (2015) was used in this study). Moreover, there appears to date to have been no consideration of exposure via direct dermal contact with e-waste articles, which may be a significant omission given recent data demonstrating the importance of dermal exposure via direct contact with FR-treated fabrics (Abdallah and Harrad, 2018).…”
Section: Human Dermal Uptake Of Hfrs and Opfrs Arising From Informal E-waste Activitiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This figure was 2 to 4 orders of magnitude higher than exposure via dermal absorption of soil and soil ingestion of DBDPE, BTBPE, and DPs in the same area (Someya et al, 2016). Similar results were also reported in Qingyuan, China, where the estimated dietary intake of DBDPE, DPs, as well as α-, β-, and γ-HBCDD were about 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than dust ingestion for both adults and children (He et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Variation In Relative Significance Of Different Exposure Pathways For Hfrs and Opfrssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…1). Similar composition profiles were also found in indoor dust collected in the UK, 64 France, 70 Germany, 90 the USA, 62 China 28 and Korea, 63 where α-HBCDD represented 46%, 44%, 55%, 63%, 68%, and 52% of ΣHBCDDs respectively. A higher proportion of α-HBCDD (63–67%) in OD was observed in China.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…E-waste is considered hazardous substances because of the composition of heavy metals, ame retardants, and other substances (Tsydenova and Bengtsson 2011). Studies have identi ed sites where e-waste is recycled and its surrounding to be the key source of numerous escaped pollutants (Chen et al 2018;Shen et al 2019) and the concentration of related pollutants is more in urban areas (Huang et al 2013). However, in spite of the potential toxicity of pollutants that's becoming obvious data on their environmental happening and exposure to human still remains mainly unfamiliar (Li et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%