Ocean imaging with two-antenna radars

Milman, A. S.; Scheffler, A. O.; Bennett, John R.

doi:10.1109/8.144592

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(We assume that the SAR points in a direction perpendicular to the platform velocity, so range is measured across track, and azimuth along track; see Figure 1.) However, a moving surface, like the ocean surface, introduces additional Doppler shifts that complicate the interpretation of the SAR images [see Milman et al, 1992]. These data are usually processed into a complex image by correlating the signal history with the response of an isolated, stationary point scatterer at the motion-compensation point.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A theory of the synthetic aperture radar images of time‐dependent scenes

Milman¹,

Scheffler²,

Bennett³

1993

J. Geophys. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data from synthetic aperture radars (SAR's) can be used to measure the surface height spectrum of the ocean. Traditionally, only the real SAR image is used; we show, both theoretically and with SAR data, that the complex image contains more information about the ocean scene. We derive an expression for the ambiguity function of the complex image, which is an extension of the concept of a power spectrum, but generalized to phenomena with time‐dependent properties. The ambiguity function of the complex image is derived as an integral of the surface height spectrum; this allows us to calculate the statistics of the complex SAR image directly, without having to generate individual realizations of the surface. In the derivation of the ambiguity function, we find that a simple assumption about the complex reflectivity of the surface leads to a formulation of the SAR imaging process that circumvents many traditional problems. By using ambiguity functions, we can remove some of the smearing that is otherwise seen in the images of time‐dependent scenes. One result of this analysis is that we can explain SAR focusing in a simple way, and extend it to range‐traveling waves as well as azimuth‐traveling waves. Also, we can calculate the correlation length and time of the surface directly from the surface height spectrum. While the correlation length seems to play only a minor role in this theory, the correlation time determines the minimum wavelength for azimuth waves that can be imaged. This paper shows how the ambiguity function of the image is related to the surface height spectrum and presents an example using SAR data.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%