2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2rp00083k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of teachers and textbooks: lower secondary teachers' perceived importance and use of chemistry textbook components

Abstract: According to several research findings all over the world textbooks play an important role for teachers in the choice of educational goals, content as well as methods. However, the open...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, textbooks serve as a window for students to understand the epistemology of the nature, form, and practice of chemical research. Chemistry textbooks appear to be designed to benefit instructors . The image textbooks convey may be unconsciously culturally biased and may influence students’ perceptions of scientists and science in harmful and inaccurate ways. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, textbooks serve as a window for students to understand the epistemology of the nature, form, and practice of chemical research. Chemistry textbooks appear to be designed to benefit instructors . The image textbooks convey may be unconsciously culturally biased and may influence students’ perceptions of scientists and science in harmful and inaccurate ways. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemistry textbooks appear to be designed to benefit instructors. 63 The image textbooks convey may be unconsciously culturally biased and may influence students' perceptions of scientists and science in harmful and inaccurate ways. 64,65 From the standpoint of information literacy, chemistry textbooks generally do not cite primary or even secondary technical sources.…”
Section: Associated Threshold Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may exist additional instances in which the undisputed history of teaching with chemistry symbols confine and disrupt conceptual understanding for other chemistry topics. Given teachers' reliance on chemistry textbooks (Gkitzia et al, 2011;Vojı ´r ˇand Rusek, 2022), researchers should explore not just whether the symbolic and particulate levels are included but the extent to which the former facilitates and/or disrupts understanding of chemical mechanism and causality. By identifying teachers and students' resistances, accommodations, and goals using MoP, we as a research field can more deeply evaluate the extent ongoing historicities of chemistry education actually align, in practice, with the principles of the NGSS and other reform efforts.…”
Section: For Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, teachers most often use the symbolic level of representation in chemistry teaching [21], which further confirms the influence of textbook design and content on teaching (cf. [24]), since symbolic representations dominate in textbooks [25][26][27][28]. The representation of reactions using sub-micro particles is thus neglected [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%