2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of transitions and models: Community engagement, democracy, and empowerment in the Austrian energy transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was even more surprising that civic participation is given the least importance by plant operators. After all, participation is regarded as a core agent for the improvement of the Energy Transition's acceptance [49,50,34]. In analyzing the operators´ specific project aims, it becomes apparent that the operators of wind energy place more value than average on nature protection and regional value creation, while operators of biogas plants are rather motivated by economic aims: base load capability, full load hours, and profitability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was even more surprising that civic participation is given the least importance by plant operators. After all, participation is regarded as a core agent for the improvement of the Energy Transition's acceptance [49,50,34]. In analyzing the operators´ specific project aims, it becomes apparent that the operators of wind energy place more value than average on nature protection and regional value creation, while operators of biogas plants are rather motivated by economic aims: base load capability, full load hours, and profitability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains the fact that surprises Sunak et al [26] (p. 51) and Höfer et al [27] (p. 240) as representatives of many other planning-oriented studies when evaluating their findings: that the sites actually used hardly concur with those identified as being optimal according to the authors' conceptions. Therefore, integrating social scientific perspectives seems appropriate, since the deployment of renewable energies is, at the same time, the result of a social construct [20] shaped by the relationships between individuals, operators' consortia, companies, as well as formal and informal institutions [2,33,34].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fuzzy cognitive maps [127] , for instance, have been established as a communication and learning tool in scenario studies [128] and extended to assess strategies and their vulnerability to uncertainties [129] , allowing citizens to evaluate climate policy strategies from their point of view, and inform [130] or improve [131] modelling exercises. As a commitment, however, the scientific community at large needs to embrace the true meaning of knowledge co-production and move beyond the sole realm of validation of results or consultation without any transformational impact, towards the ethos of creating partnerships with society [132] . Such settings, going beyond symbolic effort to creating alliances of science and society, can genuinely help understand how society’s aspirations can be mapped [133] onto requirements and opportunities of a transition driven by lifestyle changes, building on evidence of the importance of dialogue to achieve distributional justice and gender equality [134] .…”
Section: Co-developing Knowledge: Discursive and Fun Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some argue that decisions on the need for infrastructure and what types of technology should be used are best left in the hands of scientists and political decision-makers, such as national ministries, and that public participation should be organized only to evaluate the outcomes of the decision-making processes and details of the individual projects [13]. Others say that participation, especially by the local communities, brings knowledge to stakeholders at the national level and allows the decision-making processes to be improved [14], along with their legitimacy and the creation of trust [15,16].…”
Section: Participatory Governancementioning
confidence: 99%