2018
DOI: 10.19145/e-gifder.426585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Öğrenci̇leri̇n Si̇ber Mağduri̇yet Düzeyleri̇ni̇n Karşilaştirilmasi

Abstract: Gelişen teknoloji ile birlikte teknolojinin farklı kullanım alanları ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu alanların en çok kullanılanı internet olmuştur. İnternet pek çok amaca hizmet etmektedir. Hızlı, kolay ve ulaşabilir özelliklerini barındırmasıyla birlikte internet insanların yaşamlarını kolaylaştırabildiği kadar zorlaştırabilmektedir.Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, Şanlıurfa'nın Birecik ilçesinde Meslek Lisesi ve Harran Üniversitesi Birecik Meslek Yüksekokulu öğrencilerinde siber mağduriyet düzeyleri karşılaştırmalı şekild… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, when the difference of students' sensitivity levels towards cyberbullying in terms of gender is examined, it is determined that females have higher sensitivity than males. Although the sensitivity levels of females towards cyberbullying are high, it can be found in many studies that females are exposed to cyberbullying behaviour/being victimized (Peker, 2015;Smith et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2009), and research emphasizing that males are more exposed/ victimized than females (Çiftçi, 2018;Duman & Bridge, 2019;Kavuk & Keser, 2016;Peker, 2015) or studies emphasizing that there is no difference between them can be found as well (Arıcak & Özbay, 2016;Li, 2006;Pekşen Süslü & Oktay, 2018;Slonje & Smith, 2008;Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004). Besides highlighting that there is no difference between females and males in terms of being a victim of cyberbullying, Li (2006) articulated that female cyberbully victims are more likely to inform adults about it than male cyberbully victims.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when the difference of students' sensitivity levels towards cyberbullying in terms of gender is examined, it is determined that females have higher sensitivity than males. Although the sensitivity levels of females towards cyberbullying are high, it can be found in many studies that females are exposed to cyberbullying behaviour/being victimized (Peker, 2015;Smith et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2009), and research emphasizing that males are more exposed/ victimized than females (Çiftçi, 2018;Duman & Bridge, 2019;Kavuk & Keser, 2016;Peker, 2015) or studies emphasizing that there is no difference between them can be found as well (Arıcak & Özbay, 2016;Li, 2006;Pekşen Süslü & Oktay, 2018;Slonje & Smith, 2008;Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004). Besides highlighting that there is no difference between females and males in terms of being a victim of cyberbullying, Li (2006) articulated that female cyberbully victims are more likely to inform adults about it than male cyberbully victims.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Türkiye'de 2020 yılı verilerine göre internet kullanımı, 16-74 yaş grubundaki bireylerde %79,0 düzeyindedir (2). Gençlerin giderek artan interneti kullanma arzusu, yasal sınırlarının tam anlamıyla çizilmemiş olması ve sanal ortamda dolaşan kontrolsüz içerik nedeniyle kaygı uyandırmaktadır (3). İnterneti kullanma arzusunu ve süresini kontrol edemeyen gençler, bir davranışsal bağımlılık türü olan internet bağımlılığı ve sonuçları ile baş etmek zorunda kalmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified